跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Xiangjing An, Zhibin Jiao, Aiting Chen·· 12 小时前AI 评分31

覆盖大模型训练全流程的统一框架:从数据与分词、预训练到后训练对齐

A Comprehensive Framework for All Stages of Large-Model Training: From Data and Tokenization, through Pretraining, to Post-Training Alignment

AI 导读

一篇 arXiv 综述提出统一阶段划分与六维分析框架(数据、目标函数、优化策略、系统约束、评估、风险与治理),系统梳理 2017 至 2026 年的 395 篇核心文献。

正文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:The capabilities of large language models (LLMs) and multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) arise from the synergy of the full training pipeline, including data and tokenization, pretraining, and post-training (supervised fine-tuning, preference alignment, reinforcement learning, and continual optimization), rather than any individual stage. Existing surveys mostly adopt a single-stage or single-technique perspective, treating related research as isolated systems without unified stage division or a horizontally comparable basis.
This paper proposes a unified stage division and a six-dimensional analytical framework covering data, objective function, optimization strategy, system constraints, evaluation, and risk and governance. We systematically review 395 core references from 2017 to 2026, and present a conceptual map of cross-stage effects: forward constraints of pretraining on post-training, and reverse empowerment of post-training on data and pretraining.
We derive three core findings. First, the comparability of scaling laws depends on data quality and mixture, a long-neglected variable. Second, preference alignment methods (RLHF, DPO) and reasoning reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards redefine post-training boundaries, while the Pass@1 versus Pass@K debate remains unresolved. Third, multimodal training poses structural challenges to the pure-text paradigm in tokenizer design, training objectives, and evaluation.
The paper provides a cross-stage effects diagram, a method-family map, a practical decision tree, and at least 10 verifiable open problems, with an extensible skeleton for focused sub-surveys per stage. As of the retrieval date, peer-reviewed evidence (A+B) accounts for approximately 79% of the 395 references.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.33451 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2610.33451v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.33451

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: An Xiangjing [view email]
[v1] Sat, 24 Oct 2026 05:09:05 UTC (498 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org