arXiv cs.CL· Simon Rudkin·· 12 小时前AI 评分18
从写作建议到稿件治理：学术修订的约束变换框架
From Writing Advice to Manuscript Governance: A Constrained-Transformation Framework for Academic Revision
AI 导读
该论文将学术修订建模为有序约束下的可容许性问题，用任务相关不变量、上下文约束与可变表述选择界定可容许空间，并以“主张保留契约”把证据与判断绑定到获授权的主张边界。作者提出四条治理命题，分别规定保留、优先级、上下文与充分性，并实现 Academic Writing Filter 对候选修订进行筛查。该机制与技术无关，目标是在不悄然改变研究论证的前提下调整表述。
正文
Abstract:Academic revision presents a governance problem when legitimate writing objectives conflict. Writing-process and social-science research show that revision is recursive and that wording carries epistemic and disciplinary commitments. Those literatures identify important constraints but do not settle which objective should prevail when concision, outlet form or stylistic variation conflicts with evidence and claim boundaries. This paper models revision as an admissibility problem under ordered constraints. Task-relative invariants, contextual constraints and mutable presentation choices define the admissible space; a claim-preservation contract links evidence and judgement to an authorised claim boundary. Four governance propositions specify preservation, precedence, context and sufficiency. The Academic Writing Filter implements the model by screening candidate revisions; it is not a universal definition or classifier of good academic writing. The contribution is a technology-independent mechanism for changing presentation without silently changing the research argument.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.33001 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2610.33001v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.33001 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Simon Rudkin [view email]
[v1]
Tue, 6 Oct 2026 09:08:35 UTC (17 KB)
来源：arXiv cs.CL · arxiv.org