跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Uttamasha Monjoree, Wei Yan·· 10 天前AI 评分24

用结构化 CoT 提升 AI 空间智能:GPT-5.6 的旋转可视化与推理

Agentic AI with Structured CoT for Enhancing AI's Spatial Intelligence: Visualization and Reasoning of Rotation

AI 导读

研究用改进版 Revised PSVT:R 测试 GPT-5.6 的 3D 旋转空间推理能力,发现结构化 CoT 推理在 PSVT:R 和带坐标系两个数据集上均提升了基础模型表现。三种 CoT 方法(结构化 CoT、few-shot 结构化 CoT、带自优化提示的结构化 CoT)之间无显著性能差异。但移除上下文信息后,仅靠结构化 CoT 提升有限,模型在空间变换理解上仍存在明显困难。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Recent studies show that artificial intelligence (AI) with language and vision capabilities still experiences limitations in spatial reasoning. In this paper, we have studied the spatial capabilities of advanced generative AI to understand the rotations of objects in 3D space, utilizing AI's image processing and language processing features. We trained and examined the spatial intelligence of a generative Agentic AI model (GPT-5.6) to understand the spatial rotation process with rotation diagrams based on the revised Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Visualization of Rotations (Revised PSVT:R). We improvised the Revised PSVT:R by superimposing additional graphical and contextual features to evaluate how different Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning strategies influence model performance. The results indicate that structured CoT reasoning improves the spatial reasoning performance of the base GPT-5.6 model in both datasets (PSVT:R and PSVT:R with coordinate system). We used three CoT approaches - (1) Structured CoT, (2) few-shot Structured CoT, and Structured CoT with Self-optimized Prompt. The three CoT approaches evaluated in this study showed no significant performance difference. Results showed that combining structured CoT reasoning with relevant contextual information leads to considerable improvements in VLM performance on 3D rotation tasks, demonstrating the potential of agentic AI for more effective spatial reasoning. However, when contextual information is removed, structured CoT reasoning alone provides limited improvement, and the models continue to exhibit notable difficulties in understanding spatial transformations. These findings suggest that effective spatial reasoning in VLMs relies on the integration of visual, textual, and reasoning-based information in future agentic AI systems for spatial intelligence.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.04188 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2610.04188v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.04188

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Uttamasha Monjoree [view email]
[v1] Sat, 3 Oct 2026 00:56:55 UTC (1,875 KB)
[v2] Tue, 6 Oct 2026 03:11:55 UTC (1,875 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org