arXiv cs.AI· Yi-Jen Shih, Puyuan Peng, Haohe Liu, David Harwath, Abdelrahman Mohamed·· 3 天前AI 评分22
RUBATO:解耦时钟让全双工模型以硬件极限速度思考
RUBATO: Decoupled Clocks Allow Full-Duplex Models to Think as Fast as They Can
AI 导读
RUBATO 是一种多流位置编码方法,为全双工语音模型的各条流分配独立时钟,实现流间完全解耦,使模型能在任意推理解码速度下零样本插值,训练仅需两种极端解码速度。
正文 · 原文
Abstract:Recent Speech Full-Duplex (FDX) models are capable of engaging in naturalistic conversation by listening and speaking at the same time. Building on this foundation, recent architectures introduce internal thinking streams to enhance their intelligence. To guarantee these streams process successfully in real time, existing methods enforce a fixed decoding rate, which assumes a hardware profile capable of a specific latency. We argue this static approach is severely suboptimal. Because internal thinking is intrinsically asynchronous, an ideal FDX model should sustain real-time conversational flow while allowing each stream to decode at its own hardware-adaptive rate. Thinking streams must process as fast as the hardware allows to deliver accurate answers faster. To solve this, we propose RUBATO, a novel multistream positional encoding that assigns independent clocks to entirely decouple the streams. This structural isolation empowers the model to zero-shot interpolate across any inference decoding speed. It drastically simplifies dataset construction by requiring training on only two extreme decoding speeds while smoothly adapting to any intermediate rate during deployment. RUBATO demonstrates consistent robustness across five spoken reasoning tasks. On Spoken GSM8K, a baseline model collapses to 1.7% accuracy at interpolated speeds. Conversely, RUBATO-Full sustains 48.7% to 51.1% accuracy across all rates, leveraging faster hardware to achieve a 6.5x shorter time-to-answer with a constant time-to-first-response. This advantage holds on BIG-Bench Audio and amplifies significantly during complex full-duplex interruptions. Specifically, when a user interjects while the model is actively speaking and reasoning, RUBATO-Full achieves 40.0% to 45.1% accuracy, whereas the baseline fails completely.
| Subjects: | Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Sound (cs.SD) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.14299 [eess.AS] |
| (or arXiv:2610.14299v1 [eess.AS] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14299 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Yi-Jen Shih [view email]
[v1]
Fri, 9 Oct 2026 20:21:42 UTC (466 KB)
来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org