跳到正文
arXiv cs.CL· Christopher Alberto Hamonangan·· 11 小时前AI 评分31

SRRM:评估小语言模型长上下文记忆的检索-重建基准

SRRM: A Retrieval-Reconstruction Benchmark for Evaluating Long-Context Memory in Small Language Models

AI 导读

研究者提出 SRRM 基准,同时评测小语言模型的定向检索与全局信息重建能力,并引入记忆保持率(MPR)指标量化两者关系。在 Qwen2.5-0.5B/1.5B/3B 上测试 10 至 100 条事实语句的上下文负载,重建性能随上下文增长远快于检索精度下滑。

正文 · 原文

View PDF

Abstract:Small Language Models (SLMs) are increasingly deployed on consumer-grade hardware, yet their ability to preserve information across progressively longer contexts remains insufficiently understood. Existing benchmarks primarily evaluate retrieval-oriented tasks, providing limited insight into whether successful retrieval reflects comprehensive long-context memory preservation. To address this limitation, this paper introduces Simple Retrieval-Reconstruction Memory (SRRM), a lightweight and fully reproducible benchmark that jointly evaluates Targeted Retrieval and Global Information Reconstruction. This study also proposes the Memory Preservation Ratio (MPR), a benchmark-level metric that quantifies the relationship between retrieval and reconstruction performance. SRRM was evaluated using a synthetic dataset on three Qwen2.5 models (0.5B, 1.5B, and 3B parameters) across context loads ranging from 10 to 100 factual statements. Experimental results show that reconstruction performance deteriorated substantially faster than retrieval accuracy as contextual information increased, indicating that retrieval alone is insufficient to characterize long-context memory preservation. Among the evaluated models, Qwen2.5-1.5B achieved the highest retrieval accuracy (86.7%), reconstruction performance (45.7%), and MPR (0.53), outperforming the larger Qwen2.5-3B model (72.2%, 18.5%, and 0.26, respectively). These findings demonstrate that increasing parameter count does not necessarily improve long-context memory preservation. Overall, SRRM provides a reproducible and extensible benchmark for systematically evaluating long-context memory while revealing complementary memory behaviors that remain hidden under retrieval-only evaluation frameworks.
Comments: 37 pages, 20 tables, 13 figures
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2611.05386 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2611.05386v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.05386

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Christopher Alberto Hamonangan [view email]
[v1] Tue, 4 Aug 2026 12:36:39 UTC (2,766 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.CL · arxiv.org