跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Nam V. Nguyen, Hoang Van Truong, Hieu D. D., Duy Khuong Nguyen, Quang Pham, Tung Kieu·· 3 天前AI 评分31

Agentic4PDM:面向工业故障诊断的宿主治理证据准入框架

Agentic4PDM: Host-Governed Evidence Admissibility for Industrial Fault Diagnosis

AI 导读

Agentic4PDM 通过 LLM 智能体将信号与各类候选标签参考对比、识别未决差异并提出后续测量,由确定性宿主控制器执行契约校验的门控裁决(CCGA),区分佐证性支持与参考性信息。该框架支持无需任务专用诊断模型的免训练诊断,在轴承与电机诊断挑战及客户提供的未过滤工业测试集上,聚合 macro F1 优于所评估的诊断与智能体基线,消融实验进一步支持受治理工作流的价值。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:We study industrial fault diagnosis as a classification task that assigns sensor time-series windows to predefined health states or fault types. Scarce labels and changing operating conditions make repeated training of specialized classifiers costly. Yet structures such as periodicity, trends, and transients can remain diagnostically informative and be examined through reusable analytical tools. LLM agents can select and interpret these tools, but fixed rules or training-derived guidance may not resolve each signal's ambiguity, while unconstrained interpretation may overstate weak or conflicting results. We introduce Agentic4PDM, a framework that separates adaptive investigation from control over evidence use. LLM agents compare each signal with labeled references from every candidate class, identify unresolved distinctions, and propose follow-up measurements. A deterministic software controller, called the host, enforces contract-checked gated adjudication (CCGA): it checks requests, requires commitment to a complete tool batch before results are observed, and assigns evidence roles based on tool checks against labeled references. These roles distinguish corroborative support from advisory information. The Judge Agent proposes a diagnosis, while the controller checks protocol compliance and records the investigation. Agentic4PDM supports training-free diagnosis using pretrained representations and labeled references without task-specific diagnostic models, and a standard setting that additionally investigates trained-model predictions. Experiments on selected bearing and motor diagnosis challenges and an unfiltered industrial test set supplied by our customer show gains in aggregate macro F1 over the evaluated diagnostic and agentic baselines. Ablations further support the value of the governed workflow.
Comments: 67 pages, 12 figures, including appendices
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.17786 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2610.17786v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17786

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Nam Nguyen [view email]
[v1] Tue, 13 Oct 2026 06:14:27 UTC (3,858 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org