arXiv cs.AI· Songyuan Sui, Zhen Tan, Mohan Zhang, Rana Muhammad Shahroz Khan, Xia Hu, Tianlong Chen·· 3 天前AI 评分33
多模态一定更好吗?缺失模态鲁棒性的几何视角
Do More Modalities Always Help? A Geometric Perspective on Missing-Modality Robustness
AI 导读
多模态训练会让模型在推理时缺失某一模态的情况下反而不如单模态模型,这一现象出现在融合模型、CLIP 式双塔模型和视觉语言模型中。作者将其归因于主参数子空间中习得的跨模态依赖,并提出轻量参数编辑方法 Geodesic Unlearning(GU),沿测地线路径将主输入子空间旋转至单模态参考方向。实验显示 GU 在缺失模态推理下提升性能,同时保持全模态准确率,优于现有鲁棒性基线。
正文 · 原文
Abstract:Missing modality remains a longstanding challenge in multimodal learning. Existing methods typically address this issue through modality recovery or adaptive strategies. However, they overlook models' internal cross-modal dependencies formed during multimodal training, which later impair robustness. We systematically characterize a counterintuitive deployment-time failure mode: models trained on full modalities can underperform unimodal models when one modality is missing at inference time. This pattern appears across diverse architectures, such as fusion models, CLIP-style two-tower models, and vision-language models. We show that such degradation is closely associated with learned cross-modal dependencies in the principal parameter subspaces. Multimodal training induces structured rotations of these subspaces, particularly in cross-modal interaction layers. These rotations are associated with reduced task-aligned margins and larger task-aware representation harm under missing-modality inputs. We propose Geodesic Unlearning (GU), a lightweight parameter-editing method that leverages Grassmannian subspace geometry for structured subspace correction to improve missing-modality robustness. It rotates the principal input subspace toward a unimodal reference along a geodesic path. We prove that this correction minimizes the distance to the reference within a fixed subspace-distance budget. Experiments across architectures and datasets show that GU improves performance under missing-modality inference while preserving full-modality accuracy, outperforming strong missing-modality robustness baselines. These findings support a geometric view of deployment-time missing-modality degradation and suggest localized subspace editing as a practical route for robustness correction.
| Comments: | NeurIPS 2026 Main Conference |
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.04792 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2610.04792v2 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.04792 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Songyuan Sui [view email]
[v1]
Sat, 3 Oct 2026 22:34:19 UTC (192 KB)
[v2]
Tue, 13 Oct 2026 10:24:17 UTC (192 KB)
来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org