跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Jun Zhang, Tong Qian, Hua Ding, Zhi-Hui Zhan, Wei-Jie Yu, Jian-Yu Li·· 1 天前AI 评分23

轮廓辅助进化计算:从已评估解的等高线估计峰值

Contour-Assisted Evolutionary Computation: Estimating Peaks From the Contour Lines of Evaluated Solutions

AI 导读

论文提出轮廓辅助进化算法(CA-EA),将已评估解视为地形测量的高程点并绘制等高线,用持久性轮廓树与插值表面爬山定位峰值,再按面积律外推估计峰值位置、高度与形状。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Evolutionary algorithms (EAs) evaluate many candidate solutions but use them mainly to rank individuals. This paper treats the evaluated solutions as the spot heights of a topographic survey and draws the contour lines they imply. The contour map decomposes the evaluated region into peaks: in two dimensions a contour tree with persistence separates significant peaks from interpolation ripples, and in more dimensions hill climbing on the interpolated surface locates the peaks and ray-cast level sets describe them. A memory of the explored peaks directs the search to new ones. The data-supported contours of each peak are extrapolated to zero size by an area law, exact for quadratic peaks and second-order accurate for smooth ones, that estimates a peak's location, height and shape before it is sampled. A contour-assisted EA (CA-EA) inserts contour steps with local search and peak memory into a genetic algorithm (GA), differential evolution or particle swarm optimization. A contour-assisted surrogate-assisted EA (CA-SAEA), for expensive problems, spends each evaluation on surrogate-screened offspring or on sampling around a peak, entered at the maximum of the interpolated surface. On 2-D benchmarks, CA-EA reduces the evaluations a plain GA needs by factors of 12 to 112; controls attribute its gain over classical memetic search to restarting local search on distinct peaks. On the CEC 2015 expensive suite in 10 and 30 dimensions, CA-SAEA has the second-best average rank, behind DYCORS and ahead of lq-CMA-ES and the competition winner MVMO, although in 30 dimensions MVMO wins significantly on 9 functions and loses on 6; there the map beats sampling around the best point on 5 of 15 functions and loses on 3. Entering the peaks at their extrapolated locations brought no gain at these budgets, although, with enough samples, it improves the estimated heights on most two-dimensional functions.
Comments: 15 pages; supplementary material (10 pages) is provided as an ancillary file
Subjects: Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
Cite as: arXiv:2611.15641 [cs.NE]
  (or arXiv:2611.15641v1 [cs.NE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.15641

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jun Zhang [view email]
[v1] Wed, 11 Nov 2026 15:53:55 UTC (2,990 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org