跳到正文
arXiv cs.CY· Casey M. Williams, Jennifer Victoria Scurrell·· 17 小时前AI 评分31

《守望塔必要性:面向前沿 AI 的寿命校准评估》

The Watchtower Imperative: Lifespan-Calibrated Evaluation for Frontier AI

AI 导读

研究分析 2017-2026 年记录在案的人类全生命周期伤害事件后指出,现有 AI 安全评估隐含以成年用户为默认模型,导致儿童、青少年与老年人风险被系统性低估。作者提出覆盖六个生命阶段的“寿命脆弱性矩阵”与五项发展调节因子,发现风险分布呈非单调性、两端峰值且治理覆盖不对称。配套提出寿命设计原则及由自动化模拟、专家红队测试、部署后监控构成的三层外部评估框架,直接对应矩阵风险单元。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:The gap between AI capability deployment and safety assurance is structural and cannot be closed through internal evaluations alone. Analyzing documented harms (2017-2026) across the human lifespan reveals that disparate incidents --- from voice assistants endangering children to AI companions implicated in adolescent suicide and automated care denials for the elderly --- reflect a single failure: evaluating systems against an implicit adult user model. We introduce five developmental moderators structured into a Lifespan Vulnerability Matrix across six life stages. The matrix reveals a nonmonotonic risk distribution: vulnerability peaks at both ends of the lifespan, governance coverage is asymmetrical, and authority to convert model errors into real-world impact is scrutinized least. We then propose a set of lifespan design principles generalizing existing child-protective instruments, and an institution-agnostic, three-tier external evaluation framework --- comprising automated simulation, expert red teaming, and post-deployment monitoring --- indexed directly to matrix risk cells.
Subjects: Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.35725 [cs.CY]
  (or arXiv:2610.35725v1 [cs.CY] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.35725

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jennifer Victoria Scurrell [view email]
[v1] Mon, 26 Oct 2026 16:44:50 UTC (19 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.CY · arxiv.org