跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Yaodong Yang, Hongyao Tang, Yi Ma, Xingyu Fan, Weixun Wang, Jinpeng Li, Tianpei Yang·· 3 天前AI 评分41

Jev 评测能力研究:代码负责模拟,Jev 负责评估

Code Owns the Simulation, Jev Owns the Evaluation

AI 导读

判断模型 Jev 在单次调用中直接输出各选项概率,研究发现其能力边界清晰:在认知反射测试中答对 99% 的反直觉题目,但在需要模拟输入之外信息的任务中失败,如在 ALFWorld 中会把未洗的刀直接放进抽屉。若由代码提供预测或模拟(如 ALFWorld 的前瞻、机器人控制中的物理模拟),Jev 可凭借通用评估能力成为专家级控制器。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Judgment models such as \jev{} return, in a single call and without reasoning text, a probability for each described option. This makes them attractive as an agent's action-selection layer, but it is unclear which decisions they can be trusted with. We test \jev{} on reflection tests, one-shot matrix games, the text game ALFWorld and robot control, and find a sharp boundary. \jev{} succeeds when the right option can be judged from what the input describes, which we call \emph{evaluation}. Specifically, it solves 99\% of the counterintuitive Cognitive Reflection Test questions. However, it fails when the right option depends on \emph{simulation} (i.e., predicting something not in the input), such as the opponent's action or the subgoal that must come first. In games, \jev{} plays suboptimally as if its rational opponent acted at random, because the opponent's action is not given. In ALFWorld, \jev{} favors commands that mention an object or place named in the task description. For example, given the task ``put a clean knife in the drawer'', \jev{} carries an unwashed knife straight to the drawer instead of first washing it at the sink. Surprisingly, many of these failures are not due to a lack of knowledge. Asked separately what the opponent will do, \jev{} usually answers correctly, and it responds well given the opponent's action. It fails when one call must both perform the simulation and evaluate based on it. This suggests letting code make the prediction or simulation. When code supplies it, such as a lookahead in ALFWorld and physics simulation in robot control, \jev{} becomes an expert controller through its general evaluation ability.
Comments: 10 pages main text, 21 pages total with appendix; 6 figures, 7 tables. Preprint
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.01834 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2610.01834v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.01834

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Yaodong Yang Mr. [view email]
[v1] Thu, 1 Oct 2026 15:06:40 UTC (411 KB)
[v2] Sat, 10 Oct 2026 08:51:13 UTC (411 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org