跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Georgios Feretzakis, Alexandros Papaspyridis·· 14 小时前AI 评分31

离线边缘生成式 AI 的信任机制:连接状态框架与 Raspberry Pi 5 实证研究

Trust Mechanisms for Offline Generative AI at the Edge: A Connectivity-Regime Framework and an Empirical Study on a Raspberry Pi 5

AI 导读

研究提出 C0-C4 连接状态框架与推理时信任机制分类,并在网络隔离的 Raspberry Pi 5 上用 Qwen2.5 三种规模模型、三种上下文长度和 300 道 SQuAD 2.0 问题评测本地 RAG。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Generative AI and large language models (LLMs) are moving into the Internet of Things, yet most deployments assume cloud connectivity, and many IoT settings have intermittent, restricted, or no connectivity. We propose a connectivity-regime framework (C0-C4), a taxonomy of inference-time trust mechanisms, and signed, versioned knowledge packs as the update channel for disconnected regimes, and evaluate them on a Raspberry Pi 5 running fully local retrieval-augmented generation under network isolation, with three Qwen2.5 model sizes, three context sizes, and 300 SQuAD 2.0 questions. An empirically calibrated retrieval-score gate detects knowledge gaps almost perfectly (AUROC 0.97) but in-topic unanswerable questions poorly (0.68). A deterministic output validator converts malformed outputs into explicit abstentions with no observed loss of correct answers, while the NLI-based verifier we tested adds little; for the 7B model, 96% of substantive answers to unanswerable-labelled questions match normalized spans of the retrieved passages. A 3B model achieves the same gold-answer containment rate as a 7B model at less than half the latency and estimated energy, although the 7B model far more often exceeds a token-F1 threshold of 0.5; five retrieved passages lower correctness from 75% to 52% compared with three. Verifying a signed pack takes about 4.5 ms versus about 29 min for embedding its passages on the device; signature and hash checks alone accept six of nine tested update attacks that layered verification rejects. Yet a validly signed poisoned pack passes every pack check: on 30 previously correct questions, correct answers drop to zero and 14 return the injected answer. None of the mechanisms we evaluated establishes the truth of the evidence. We release code and data.
Comments: 25 pages, 4 figures, 6 tables. Code and data: this https URL
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.33732 [cs.CR]
  (or arXiv:2610.33732v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.33732

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Georgios Feretzakis [view email]
[v1] Sat, 24 Oct 2026 15:23:25 UTC (157 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org