跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Nathan Delisle, Chenhao Tan·· 10 小时前AI 评分31

大规模激活干扰稀疏自编码器评估,研究者提出 PC1 去除修正法

Massive Activations Confound Sparse Autoencoders

AI 导读

稀疏自编码器(SAE)的方差解释率与消融损伤两项常用评估指标会被大规模激活干扰:最多 99.9% 的激活方差集中在第一主成分(PC1)上,而 PC1 没有唯一的稀疏分解,导致每次 SAE 训练重建出的特征不同。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are commonly evaluated by variance explained and ablation damage. We show how massive activations undermine both evaluations, and propose a correction. Massive activations cause up to 99.9% of activation variance to lie along the first principal component (PC1). Because the PC1 component has no unique sparse decomposition, each SAE run rebuilds it from a different set of features. These features dominate importance rankings: an average of 47 of the 50 most important features are unmatched in a separate run, compared with about 27 of a random 50. A dictionary can also report 99.96% of variance explained while leaving 33% of the variance outside PC1 unexplained. We bypass PC1 by training the SAE on activations with PC1 removed, then adding PC1 to the reconstruction. In affected models, the top-50 feature sharing rate rises from 4-39.5% to 73-99.5%. At the same TopK sparsity, the resulting SAE degrades the model up to 44% less and reduces content reconstruction error by up to 33.9%.
Comments: Accepted at NeurIPS 2026 (poster). Code: this https URL. SAEs: this https URL
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2611.13548 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2611.13548v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.13548

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Nathan Delisle [view email]
[v1] Tue, 10 Nov 2026 04:08:55 UTC (320 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org