跳到正文
arXiv cs.CL· Jiajin Liu, Chenxi Xu, Dongzhe Fan, Yuanfu Sun, Qiaoyu Tan·· 6 天前AI 评分24

SEEDS:面向搜索智能体的预览引导证据准入框架

SEEDS: Preview-Guided Evidence Admission for Search Agents

AI 导读

SEEDS 是一个预览引导的证据准入框架,让搜索智能体在每一步检索后先查看候选文档的轻量预览,再结合当前推理状态自行决定哪些、以及多少候选应被完整读取,而非按固定或排名前缀策略消费证据。在九个知识密集型 QA 基准上,覆盖本地语料与实时网页搜索,SEEDS 一致提升搜索效果并大幅减少完整证据消耗,且能直接接入现有推理智能体或通过学习进一步优化。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Search agents extend large reasoning models with multi-round access to external knowledge, yet most existing systems largely conflate retrieving evidence with consuming it. Retrieved documents are commonly incorporated according to fixed or rank-based policies, despite the fact that evidence utility is conditioned on the agent's current reasoning state. Consequently, a lower-ranked candidate may be critical for the current step, while a higher-ranked candidate may provide redundant, irrelevant, or misleading information. We formulate this overlooked problem as evidence admission, which asks, at each search step, which retrieved candidates should be allowed to enter the agent's evolving reasoning context. To enable such selective control, we introduce SEEDS (Selective Evidence Entry During Search), a preview-guided evidence admission framework for search agents. SEEDS first exposes lightweight previews of retrieved candidates and then lets the agent jointly determine which candidates and how many should be fully inspected, conditioned on its current reasoning state. Unlike fixed or adaptive prefix policies, SEEDS can select arbitrary subsets with flexible cardinality, and it can be instantiated directly with an existing reasoning agent or further optimized through learning. Across nine knowledge-intensive QA benchmarks under both local corpus and live web search, SEEDS consistently improves search effectiveness while substantially reducing full-evidence consumption. Experimental analyses show that SEEDS more effectively selects useful candidates beyond the corresponding retrieval prefix. These results establish evidence admission as a complementary dimension of agentic search, separating what information is retrieved from what information is ultimately allowed to shape reasoning.
Comments: 7 figures, 20 pages
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.12932 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2610.12932v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.12932

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jiajin Liu [view email]
[v1] Fri, 9 Oct 2026 03:25:39 UTC (3,331 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.CL · arxiv.org