跳到正文
arXiv cs.CL· Seungone Kim, Jiayi Geng, Young-Jun Lee, Bo Liu, Juyoung Suk, Nicholas Lubbers, Mitchell Wood, Marcus Noack, Yong-Xin Yao, Yuan Shi, Roxana Bujack, Cristina Garcia Cardona, Austin Rodriguez, Ilon Joseph, Woojin Cho, Zora Zhiruo Wang, Chuanyang Jin, Ian Wu, Apurva Gandhi, Tianjian Li, Weiwei Sun, Carolin Lawrence, Kiril Gashteovski, Dongyeop Kang, Jay Shin, Akari Asai, Graham Neubig, Sean Welleck·· 3 天前AI 评分62

Into the Unknown:在开放科研问题上评测 AI 智能体

Into the Unknown: Benchmarking AI agents on open scientific research problems

AI 导读

研究者提出 Into the Unknown 基准,给智能体一篇科学论文和一个研究方向,要求其撰写后续论文。他们与 US Department of Energy(DOE)国家实验室的科学家合作,由后者提供各自工作中未发表的后续方向及投稿必须满足的条件,并据此形成评分标准。

正文 · 原文

Authors:Seungone Kim, Jiayi Geng, Young-Jun Lee, Bo Liu, Juyoung Suk, Nicholas Lubbers, Mitchell Wood, Marcus Noack, Yong-Xin Yao, Yuan Shi, Roxana Bujack, Cristina Garcia Cardona, Austin Rodriguez, Ilon Joseph, Woojin Cho, Zora Zhiruo Wang, Chuanyang Jin, Ian Wu, Apurva Gandhi, Tianjian Li, Weiwei Sun, Carolin Lawrence, Kiril Gashteovski, Dongyeop Kang, Jay Shin, Akari Asai, Graham Neubig, Sean Welleck

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Can AI agents carry out research on open scientific problems? We introduce Into the Unknown, a benchmark that provides an agent with a science paper along with a research direction to pursue and tasks it to write a follow-up paper. We work with scientists at US Department of Energy (DOE) national laboratories, who each contribute an unpublished follow-up direction from their own work together with the necessary conditions a submission must meet. While assessing the quality of a follow-up paper is challenging in general, using these conditions to form a rubric makes evaluation more tractable for research problems that have no reference answer. We have nine frontier agents write 15 follow-ups each, spanning quantum computing, plasma physics, computational chemistry, materials science, and scientific machine learning domains. None of the 135 submissions satisfies all the conditions, and 114 fail our integrity check, most often because the paper claims work that was never done or reports numbers that contradict the recorded evidence. Overall, agents readily produce papers that look like follow-ups, but none meets the standard of the domain scientist, leaving substantial headroom. Our code and data are publicly available.
Comments: preprint under review
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.19159 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2610.19159v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.19159

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Seungone Kim [view email]
[v1] Tue, 13 Oct 2026 20:25:59 UTC (4,453 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.CL · arxiv.org