跳到正文
RadarAI· X:Arena (@arena)·· 2 小时前AI 评分62

Meta Muse Ember (Max) 以 1608 分登顶 Code Arena: WebDev 最高分小模型

AI 导读

Arena 宣布 Meta 的 Muse Ember (Max) 进入 Code Arena: WebDev,以 1608 分成为榜上最高分小模型,超过 Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) 的 1595 分和 GPT-6 Luna (Max) 的 1578 分。

正文 · 原文

Arena.ai· @arena · X·2026-11-10 02:22· 29 分钟前AI 评分71

AI 导读

Arena 宣布 Meta 的 Muse Ember (Max) 进入 Code Arena: WebDev,以 1608 分成为榜上最高分小模型,超过 Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) 的 1595 分和 GPT-6 Luna (Max) 的 1578 分。三者 API 定价同为 $0.10/$0.50 per million tokens,但 Ember 中位成本 $0.03/task,低于 Luna 的 $0.06 和 Haiku 的 $0.11,处于 Pareto 前沿;作者实测其平均约 2 分钟、约 $0.04 完成一个任务。

正文 · 原文

Muse Ember (Max) from @AIatMeta just landed in the Code Arena: WebDev as the highest-performing small model - built for fast, high-quality, low-cost work.

Watch the video below: 20+ websites and animations, all generated by Ember in one go. Across the generations we timed, the average was about 2 minutes and about $0.04 per task.

引用Arena.ai@arena

Exciting news: @AIatMeta's Muse Ember (Max) is the highest-performing small model in the Code Arena: WebDev with 1608 pts, outperforming two leading small models from Anthropic and OpenAI:

  • Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): #35, 1595 pts
  • GPT-6 Luna (Max): #42, 1578 pts

At a 1608 score at a median cost of $0.03 per task, this puts Ember on the Pareto frontier. Neither Haiku 5.5 nor Luna makes it. Despite all three models having the same API pricing of $0.10/$0.50 per million input/output tokens, Ember's median cost per task is 2× lower than Luna ($0.06) and 3.7× lower than Haiku ($0.11).

In our own testing, Ember demonstrated impressive speed and efficiency, completing 25 complex generations in 2 mins per task, at a total cost of just $1.

Huge congrats to @alexandr_wang and the @AIatMeta team on this impressive release! A major step forward for small models that deliver strong real-world coding capabilities at a fraction of the cost.

在 X 查看被引用的帖子

来源:Arena.ai · x.com

事件后续 · 1

查看事件全部

来源:RadarAI · aihot.news