跳到正文
arXiv cs.CL· Mahdi Salmani, Adel Javanmard, Devansh Gupta, Meisam Razaviyayn·· 13 小时前AI 评分23

Direct Pass@$k$ 优化:面向思维剪枝的质量与多样性平衡

Direct Pass@$k$ Optimization for Thought Pruning: Balancing Quality and Diversity in Test-Time Reasoning

AI 导读

研究者提出一种直接优化 pass@$k$ 的思维剪枝方法,通过选择使"至少一个部分解续写后得到正确答案"概率最大的候选池,将质量与多样性的权衡内化到目标函数中。在八个开源权重推理模型上,该方法优于现有的质量型与多样性型剪枝策略,在保留中等数量部分解继续生成时增益尤为明显。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Test-time scaling has emerged as a key inference strategy for reasoning models, where a model generates a large number of candidate solutions in the hope of finding at least one correct solution. Running all candidate solutions to completion can be computationally demanding, so recent work prunes the candidate pool after generating only a short prefix, committing further computation only to the surviving candidates. Existing pruning strategies divide broadly into two categories: Quality-based methods assign a score to each partial solution and discard those predicted to ultimately lead to an incorrect final solution, while diversity-based methods select partial solutions that follow different reasoning trajectories and are therefore likely to cover different final solutions. The tension between these two objectives is an instance of exploration versus exploitation, yet little to no prior work on pruning exposes this trade-off directly, let alone optimizes it. In this paper, we introduce a pruning procedure that addresses this trade-off directly by optimizing pass@$k$ over the selected solution pool. In particular, it chooses the pool to maximize the probability that at least one of its partial solutions, when continued to completion, yields a correct answer. Because this objective simultaneously rewards high-quality partial solutions and penalizes redundancy among them, quality and diversity are naturally balanced by the criterion itself rather than through separate ad-hoc design choices. On eight open-weight reasoning models, our method outperforms existing quality-based and diversity-based pruning strategies. The gains are particularly pronounced when the pruning procedure keeps a moderate number of partial solutions for continued generation, highlighting the value of directly balancing quality and diversity during pruning.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.31667 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2610.31667v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.31667

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Mahdi Salmani [view email]
[v1] Thu, 22 Oct 2026 17:59:48 UTC (868 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.CL · arxiv.org