arXiv cs.AI· Achuth Chandrasekhar, Amir Barati Farimani·· 10 小时前AI 评分32
LLM 智能体通过 MCP 发现交换关联泛函 O159,自洽验证优于 ωB97M-V
Agent-Guided Discovery of Exchange-Correlation Functionals with Physics-based Validation
AI 导读
研究者将前沿 LLM 智能体通过 Model Context Protocol 接入 GPU 评估器,发现 13 参数交换关联泛函 O159,其同自旋关联乘以平滑密度窗口。
正文 · 原文
Abstract:Accurate, compact exchange--correlation functionals are central to predictive density functional theory. Symbolic search and language-model agents can propose new functional forms, but it remains unclear whether their gains survive self-consistency and external evaluation, whether the new terms carry physical content, whether agents outperform evolutionary search, and how language-model backbones compare. We connect frontier LLM agents to a GPU evaluator through the Model Context Protocol, with training-only fitting, persistent memory, and self-consistent and external evaluation. Opus-5.5 agents passed the screening gate with about 40-fold fewer tokens than Codex (GPT-6-Astra) agents and found a candidate with lower validation and held-out errors; only this candidate advanced to self-consistent evaluation. The resulting 13-parameter functional, O159, multiplies same-spin correlation by a smooth density window. Refitted controls favor a window that scales the entire same-spin factor, reducing it by 15--30\% at its peak, and that acts on reaction energies mainly in near-iso-orbital regions; against a refitted no-window control, it lowers heavy-atom total-energy errors on GSCDB137 by 29\%. With about 400 fits each, SyFES evolution did not improve on its GAS22 seed, whereas the agents found forms 0.10--0.13 \kcal\ lower in validation error by adding an explicit density scale. Self-consistent O159 lowers the held-out MGCDB84 test error of $\omega$B97M-V by 11.7\%, and its mean normalized error ratio on 36 GSCDB137 datasets (1.139) is comparable to $\omega$B97M-V (1.144) and below GAS22 (1.190). Frontier-LLM agents thus produced O159, a compact functional whose improvement over $\omega$B97M-V survives self-consistent, physics-based validation.
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2611.13329 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2611.13329v1 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.13329 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Achuth Chandrasekhar [view email]
[v1]
Mon, 9 Nov 2026 22:56:02 UTC (3,527 KB)
来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org