arXiv cs.CL· Shihan Dou, Shaofan Liu, Zhonghang Lu, Jiahang Lin, Shichun Liu, Binghai Wang, Jiajie Jin, Guanting Dong, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang·· 13 小时前AI 评分38
EvoIn:连接进化与内化的智能体微调框架
EvoIn: Bridging Evolution and Internalization for Agent Fine-Tuning
AI 导读
EvoIn 是一个连接进化与内化的智能体微调框架,先分析执行轨迹以进化并验证新的决策流程,再将改进后的推理轨迹改写为自包含形式并微调模型,使改进的决策能力在推理时无需进化后的 harness 也能保留。在多项基准上,EvoIn 将域内通过率提升 10.9 个百分点、域外提升 9.2 个百分点,且内化的决策流程可泛化到未见任务,在另一模型家族上也表现出一致提升。
正文 · 原文
Authors:Shihan Dou, Shaofan Liu, Zhonghang Lu, Jiahang Lin, Shichun Liu, Binghai Wang, Jiajie Jin, Guanting Dong, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
Abstract:Recent work has explored improving agents by jointly evolving their harnesses and models, but often takes a ''potpourri'' approach that bundles together new tools, new decision-making procedures, and model adaptation to the evolved harness under a single notion of agent improvement. In this paper, we instead investigate how agents can improve their decision-making procedures. In particular, we propose EvoIn, an agent fine-tuning framework that bridges evolution and internalization. EvoIn first analyzes agent execution traces to evolve and validate new decision-making procedures by temporarily instantiating them in the harness. The validated procedures guide the agent to generate improved reasoning traces. These traces are then rewritten into self-contained reasoning traces, removing explicit references to harness instructions while expressing the induced decision logic as the model's own reasoning. Finally, EvoIn fine-tunes the model on the rewritten traces, internalizing these procedures so that the improved decision-making persists without the evolved harness at inference time. We evaluate EvoIn on diverse benchmarks and find that it consistently enables agents to learn stronger decision-making procedures, raising the pass rate by 10.9 points in-domain and by 9.2 points out-of-domain. Results further show that the internalized decision procedures generalize to unseen tasks. Case studies show that agents can learn to decide how to solve a task before solving it, for example by checking a document's length to choose between reading it in full and searching it. EvoIn is also broadly applicable, showing consistent improvements on another model family.
| Comments: | 36 pages, 3 figures |
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.35290 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2609.35290v2 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35290 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Shihan Dou [view email]
[v1]
Mon, 28 Sep 2026 14:36:01 UTC (215 KB)
[v2]
Tue, 27 Oct 2026 16:31:42 UTC (215 KB)
来源:arXiv cs.CL · arxiv.org