跳到正文
arXiv cs.CL· Minhyeon Oh, Chiyeong Heo, Geonwoo Noh, Hoyoung Kim, Jangwon Son, Jungseul Ok·· 12 小时前AI 评分52

BlackSwan:用猜想与反驳验证语言模型智能体的动作

Action Verification through Conjecture and Refutation for Language Model Agents

AI 导读

论文提出 BlackSwan,一种面向语言模型智能体的反驳式动作验证流程:先预测每个会改变状态的动作的预期效果,再构造可检验的出错假设,用已有观察或额外的非变更动作来检验,只有没有任何假设成立时才执行该动作。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Language model agents increasingly act on users' behalf by manipulating external environments through tools, often from high-level instructions that leave critical task- and environment-specific context unstated. To prevent resulting misaligned actions, recent work verifies proposed actions before execution, largely by establishing whether the conditions supporting them hold. We argue that this confirmation-oriented view leaves a fundamental blind spot: a wrong action often passes every check that asks whether it is right. This motivates a different question for verification: rather than asking what evidence supports an action, can the agent find evidence that refutes it? We pursue this direction with BlackSwan, a refutation-oriented, expect-suspect-test procedure that predicts the intended effect of each state-mutating action, formulates specific and empirically testable hypotheses for how it could be wrong, and tests them using existing observations or additional non-mutating actions, executing the action only if none survives testing. On challenging AppWorld tasks, BlackSwan improves success rate over the strongest baseline by 14.9 and 25.2%p with and without the backbone model's thinking mode, respectively. Even without thinking or in-context demonstrations, it outperforms stronger baselines equipped with them. The gains also transfer beyond AppWorld, with BlackSwan improving WebShop performance by 12.7%p. More broadly, our results suggest that language model agents have an underused capacity to recognize and self-correct misaligned actions, which can be systematically elicited through active conjecture and refutation before execution.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2611.02950 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2611.02950v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.02950

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Minhyeon Oh [view email]
[v1] Mon, 2 Nov 2026 11:15:40 UTC (420 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.CL · arxiv.org