arXiv cs.AI· Hannan Mahadik, David Salinas, Jacek Golebiowski, Aaron Klein·· 12 小时前AI 评分29
DPO 超参数景观研究:该测什么、如何随规模变化、何时不可迁移
The Shape of the DPO Hyperparameter Landscape: What to Measure, How It Moves with Scale, and When Not to Transfer It
AI 导读
一项针对 DPO 超参数景观的大规模实验发现,最优学习率随模型规模变化,且超参数无法跨训练数据集迁移。验证损失是超参数优化的糟糕代理指标,最小化验证损失的超参数与下游基准最优超参数仅弱相关,因此 DPO 超参数需针对目标模型、数据集和评估目标单独调优。短程候选训练可显著降低这一选择成本,全部训练配置与评估结果已公开。
正文 · 原文
Abstract:Direct preference optimisation (DPO) is widely used for language model post-training, but its performance depends strongly on the choice of its hyperparameters, such as the learning rate and the reference-policy regularisation parameter $\beta$. To better understand the DPO hyperparameter landscape, we conduct extensive experiments using a dense hyperparameter grid across different model scales from the same family. This allows us to analyse how the optimal DPO hyperparameters evolve with model size and the number of update steps, with intermediate checkpoints providing an inexpensive signal to accelerate the hyperparameter optimisation process. Furthermore, by evaluating our models on both static and dynamic benchmarks, we identify which benchmarks provide the strongest signal for hyperparameter selection. Finally, we investigate how different state-of-the-art hyperparameter optimisation strategies perform in this setting. Our experiments show that the optimal learning rate varies with model size and that hyperparameters are not transferable across training datasets. We also find that validation loss is a poor proxy for hyperparameter optimisation, as hyperparameters that minimize validation loss only weakly correlate with optimal hyperparameters for downstream benchmarks. Therefore, DPO hyperparameters need to be tuned specifically for the target model, dataset, and evaluation objective. We also show that short candidate training runs can substantially reduce the cost of this selection. We release all our training configurations and evaluation results to support reproducible analysis of selection quality and training cost.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.27895 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2610.27895v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.27895 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Hannan Mahadik [view email]
[v1]
Tue, 20 Oct 2026 09:14:22 UTC (3,829 KB)
来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org