跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Yeonsung Jung, Zhiyuan Wang, Zifan Wang, V\'itor Albiero, Benjamin Newman, Edoardo Debenedetti, Ivan Evtimov, Ninareh Mehrabi·· 6 天前AI 评分30

X-AgentRed:在演进的多服务生态中对个人智能体进行红队测试

X-AgentRed: Red-Teaming Personal Agents in Evolving Multi-Service Ecosystems

AI 导读

X-AgentRed 是一个自进化红队测试框架,通过工具依赖图发现有害的工具调用路径,并利用执行反馈扩展和优化这些路径。在四个前沿智能体模型上,X-AgentRed 的有害路径率达到 STAC 的 1.77 倍,工具覆盖平均提升至 2.99 倍。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Personal agents increasingly connect to services across the web and applications by using tools. As the effects of their actions accumulate and interact across services, unintended or harmful outcomes can arise when agents fulfill benign user requests. Proactively identifying these compositional failures requires systematically exploring diverse cross-service paths. Existing red-teaming methods often simply prompt LLMs to identify potentially harmful paths from task and environment descriptions or decompose harmful objectives specified by humans or LLMs into seemingly benign action combinations. However, generation is biased toward patterns learned during training, potentially favoring familiar tool combinations and leaving novel cross-service interactions underexplored. To address this, we propose X-AgentRed, a self-evolving red-teaming framework that discovers harmful tool call paths through a graph of tool dependencies and expands and refines them using execution feedback. By analyzing each tool's effects, potential harms, and preconditions for execution, the red-teaming agent constructs a directed graph that captures how one tool's effects can satisfy another's execution preconditions. Recipes sampled from this graph are instantiated as realistic scenarios in which agents can produce harmful outcomes. Execution feedback enables self-improvement by diversifying paths that produce harm through tool substitution and refining preconditions at blocked steps in unsuccessful paths to enable further execution. Across four frontier agentic models, X-AgentRed achieves $1.77\times$ the harmful path rate of STAC and explores a more diverse set of tools, yielding $2.99\times$ the tool coverage on average.
Comments: 18 pages. Project page: this https URL
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.13886 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2610.13886v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.13886

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Yeonsung Jung [view email]
[v1] Fri, 9 Oct 2026 17:34:44 UTC (393 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org