同一块 H100 每小时租金从 2.69 美元到 12.29 美元不等
The same H100 costs $2.69 or $12.29 an hour depending where you rent it
datareceipts 统计了 AWS、Azure 与多家 neocloud 的按需 GPU 价格，同一块 H100 SXM 80GB 每小时最低 2.69 美元（RunPod Community）、最高 12.29 美元（Azure ND96isr_H100_v5），相差 4.57 倍，连续租一个月分别是 1964 美元和 8972 美元。
109 — What an H100 actually costs per hour
On-demand GPU rental prices across AWS, Azure and the neoclouds, normalised to dollars per GPU per hour and grouped so only identical GPUs are compared.
Result
| H100 SXM 80GB | $/GPU-hr | A month (730 h) |
|---|---|---|
| RunPod Community | $2.69 | $1,964 |
| RunPod Secure | $3.99 | $2,913 |
AWS p5.48xlarge |
$6.88 | $5,022 |
Azure ND96isr_H100_v5 |
$12.29 | $8,972 |
4.57× between cheapest and dearest, for the same chip. One GPU running continuously for a month is $1,964 or $8,972 depending only on where you rent it.
The comparison is grouped, deliberately
"An H100" is three different products. The SXM 80GB, the PCIe 80GB and the NVL 94GB all get marketed as H100s and they do not cost the same. Putting them in one chart manufactures a spread that isn't there, so every comparison here is within a single (model, memory) group.
The same applies within a vendor: Azure lists the same A100 PCIe 80GB at one, two and four GPUs per VM for $3.67, $4.78 and $4.78 per GPU-hour. The spread uses each vendor's cheapest route to a given GPU, so an Azure-vs-Azure gap never shows up as a market gap. RunPod Secure and Community are counted as one company.
What the 4.57× is not
It is not pure margin. Going from Azure's ND series to RunPod Community gives up:
- InfiniBand. Azure's ND SKU has 400 Gbps per GPU of Quantum-2 InfiniBand with GPU Direct RDMA, which is what makes multi-node training work. That is the reason the ND series is priced above Azure's own single-H100 NC SKU ($6.98).
- A datacentre SLA. RunPod Community is third-party hosts renting out their own hardware.
- Enterprise compliance, committed capacity, and the rest of the hyperscaler surface.
If you are fine-tuning on one node, you are paying for an interconnect you will never use. If you are training across 64 nodes, the cheap row is not an option.
Files
| File | What it is |
|---|---|
collect.py |
Pulls AWS Price List + Azure Retail Prices. No auth required. |
hyperscalers.json |
What those APIs returned. |
vendors.json |
Neocloud prices, transcribed, with source URL and date read. |
compute.py |
Grouping, per-vendor normalisation, spreads. |
compare.json |
Output. |
python3 collect.py # ~1 GB AWS index, slow
python3 compute.pyLimitations
- On-demand list prices only. Reserved, committed-use and spot pricing all cut the hyperscaler numbers, and spot in particular would narrow the gap a lot.
- Single region each (AWS
us-east-1, Azureeastus). - GPU counts come from vendor documentation, not from the price label — AWS
reports "640 GB HBM3" for a p5 and Azure reports an accelerator-memory total,
and neither states a per-GPU model. Doc URLs are in
compare.json. - Lambda is excluded from the headline spread. Its published page states the listed rates take effect 2026-11-16; current rates are behind a login. Its rows are shown separately and labelled.
- Availability is not priced. A cheap H100 you cannot get is not a price.
来源：Hacker News · github.com