跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Junbo Jacob Lian, Kaixuan Chen, Hanzhang Qin, Huiling Chen, Chaoyu Zhang, Chung-Piaw Teo·· 11 小时前AI 评分31

语言模型知道哪些约束该放在一起吗?JointDW 用 LLM 预测 Dantzig-Wolfe 重构造的约束分组

Do Language Models Know Which Constraints Belong Together?

AI 导读

研究提出 JointDW,用语言模型读取模型中的约束名称与文本,预测 Dantzig-Wolfe 重构造中哪些约束族需联合凸化才能收紧线性松弛,并用分阶段搜索验证预测、与最优 LP 对偶的前瞻方法交错执行。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Dantzig-Wolfe reformulation strengthens the linear relaxation of a mixed-integer program by convexifying a chosen set of constraint families, and every candidate costs a column generation run. The choice is hard when families strengthen the bound only together, because a search that adds one family at a time then stops at the linear relaxation. The classical inequalities of lot sizing, network design and facility location rest on such zero-marginal groups. We prove that when each evaluation convexifies at most $s$ of $k$ families, any method that observes only bounds needs a covering number of evaluations, of order $k^w$, to find a hidden group of $w$ families, also on actual Dantzig-Wolfe relaxations. A prediction that misses $e$ members reduces the cost to $\Theta(k^e)$, through one staged search that does not need to know $e$, so the evaluations a prediction saves measure what the predictor knows. We study two sources of predictions. A one-pass lookahead at an optimal LP dual is provably blind to groups whose families share no variable, and a language model reads the names and text of the model. JointDW verifies the prediction of the language model with the staged search and interleaves it with the lookahead at a bounded loss. Groups that strengthen the bound only jointly appear in a quarter of the MIPLIB-NL models whose bound can be improved. There the strongest language models identify them about as often as the lookahead, their predictions rest on the names for textbook models, and reasoning about doubles the accuracy of the same model. On larger models with distracting families, the lookahead finds the group in one evaluation of three families. Language models given only the text seldom name it, while one reasoning model given every coefficient names it in all but one answer and then needs fewer evaluations than the lookahead for pairs of families.
Comments: 23 pages, 4 figures, 15 tables. Code and data: this https URL
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
Cite as: arXiv:2611.05726 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2611.05726v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.05726

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Junbo Jacob Lian [view email]
[v1] Tue, 3 Nov 2026 22:55:13 UTC (253 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org