跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Abhinav Arun, Reetu Raj Harsh, Bhaskarjit Sarmah, Stefano Pasquali·· 11 小时前AI 评分29

FinMultiHopQA:基于知识图谱的多跳金融问答基准,用于证据驱动推理

FinMultiHopQA: A KG-Grounded Multi-Hop Financial QA Benchmark for Evidence-Driven Reasoning

AI 导读

FinMultiHopQA 是一个包含 15,600 道定性与定量问题的多跳金融问答基准,基于从 SEC 10-K 文件构建、含 17.5M+ 三元组的时间索引金融知识图谱 FinReflectKG。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Multi-hop financial question answering often requires composing evidence distributed across filing sections, fiscal years, and peer companies. Prior financial QA benchmarks address parts of this problem individually, but none jointly support controlled multi-hop taxonomies, document topologies, motif-level reproducibility, and provenance-linked auditability at scale. We introduce FinMultiHopQA, a benchmark of 15,600 qualitative and quantitative questions, grounded in FinReflectKG, a temporally indexed financial knowledge graph derived from SEC 10-K filings with 17.5M+ triples. The pipeline instantiates statistically salient 2-3 hop typed KG motifs across intra-document, inter-year, and cross-company regimes. Beyond closing this gap, the same construction lets us hold each question's underlying evidence constant while varying only its presentation - embedding it in noisy surrounding context or changing its order - giving a controlled instrument to study a secondary question at scale: using six such presentations, we test whether reasoning LLMs' performance depends on evidence structure. Results confirm this: despite their reasoning capacity, judged correctness remains consistently lower under less-structured presentations of the same evidence - most sharply for quantitative cross-company reasoning and 3-hop branch motifs - indicating that reasoning alone does not fully offset how evidence is structured; KG-linked presentation also uses fewer input tokens by design. We release the benchmark, provenance annotations, model outputs, evaluation records, and supporting technical documentation.
Comments: 8 pages, 4 figures. Major revision of v1 with an expanded benchmark of 15,600 QA pairs, enhanced KG-driven question generation, additional evidence evaluation protocols, broader model evaluations, and expert quality validation
Subjects: Computational Finance (q-fin.CP); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2510.02906 [q-fin.CP]
  (or arXiv:2510.02906v2 [q-fin.CP] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.02906

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Abhinav Arun [view email]
[v1] Fri, 3 Oct 2025 11:19:31 UTC (2,227 KB)
[v2] Wed, 4 Nov 2026 19:25:56 UTC (491 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org