跳到正文
arXiv cs.CL· Fei Ding·· 9 天前AI 评分22

群体策略优化中 KL 正则化为何失效:ZCPO 用条件 KL 校准组内奖励系数

When KL Regularization Misfires in Group Policy Optimization

AI 导读

针对移除参考策略 KL 正则化有时反而提升群体策略优化效果的现象,研究者分析了 KL 与奖励交互中的七种潜在失效模式,包括奖励裁剪后的残余 KL 更新、梯度抵消、同奖励组内 KL 增长、KL 随回复长度增长及贡献失衡、KL 集中于少量 token,以及将 k1 纳入奖励时的采样噪声。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Why does removing reference-policy KL regularization sometimes improve group policy optimization? This motivates studying how reference-policy information should enter group-relative updates. We analyze seven potential failure modes in the interactions between KL and rewards: residual KL updates after reward clipping, after gradient cancellation, and in groups with identical rewards; KL growth with response length and an imbalance in its relative contribution; KL concentration on a small number of tokens; and sampling noise when k1 is incorporated into rewards. We propose Zero-Sum Calibrated Policy Optimization (ZCPO), which uses relative drift measured by conditional KL to calibrate within-group reward coefficients and integrates them into the base surrogate. Mathematical reasoning experiments and ablations support this design's effectiveness in our settings.
Comments: 27 pages
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
MSC classes: 68T05, 68T50
ACM classes: I.2.6; I.2.7
Cite as: arXiv:2610.12161 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2610.12161v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.12161

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ding Fei [view email]
[v1] Thu, 8 Oct 2026 15:39:09 UTC (2,295 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.CL · arxiv.org