arXiv cs.AI· Parth A. Gandhi, Avital Aviv, Prasanna N. Wudali, Yuval Elovici, Asaf Shabtai·· 14 小时前AI 评分52
Scan Before You Install:检测与缓解 Agent 技能中的本地及组合漏洞
Scan Before You Install: Detecting and Mitigating Local and Composite Vulnerabilities in Skills
AI 导读
研究团队提出六模块扫描器,用于检测 Agent 技能中非恶意的本地漏洞与多技能组合漏洞。其本地分析在 SkillTrustBench 的 556 例子集上召回率 95.90%。
正文 · 原文
Abstract:An agent skill packages natural-language instructions, scripts, and reference files that an LLM-based agent loads for a task. Skills may access the file system, shell, and network under user-authorized permissions; weaknesses can lead to unsafe execution. Existing scanners primarily target malicious skills, not unintended vulnerabilities in public repositories, and analyze skills in isolation, overlooking multi-skill interactions. To address these gaps, we developed a six-module scanner: Content Extraction, Local Analysis, Composite Analysis, Validation, Reporting, and Mitigation. Local Analysis detects unintended vulnerabilities in benign skills. On a 556-case leaderboard subset of SkillTrustBench, it achieved 95.90% recall with a 4.22% false positive rate; on a balanced sample of 1,000 MalSkillBench skills, its F1 was 0.947, outperforming Cisco's Skill Scanner, NVIDIA's SkillSpector, AgentSkillsScanner, and SkillSieve. In 1,587 skills from the 75 most-starred GitHub repositories, three analysts confirmed 53 of 59 findings (89.8% precision) across 23 repositories. We developed proof-of-concept (PoC) attacks for each vulnerability, disclosed 10 medium- and high-severity cases to maintainers, and tested mitigations on the remaining cases. Composite Analysis models dependencies among skills through shared resources, invocations, and instruction-mediated interactions. On SCR-Bench, its F1 score was 0.991 (98.7% precision, 99.6% recall), versus 0.816-0.858 for three SkillsGuard configurations released with CompoSkill. It identified two composite findings on GitHub, validated by PoC attacks. The Mitigation module recommends skill substitution, patches, and configuration changes. For 47 of 55 GitHub findings, mitigations prevented PoC attacks in all trials while preserving tested legitimate functionality.
| Subjects: | Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.37901 [cs.CR] |
| (or arXiv:2610.37901v1 [cs.CR] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.37901 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Asaf Shabtai [view email]
[v1]
Tue, 27 Oct 2026 19:43:31 UTC (1,588 KB)
来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org