arXiv cs.AI· Peter Sunehag·· 14 小时前AI 评分24
从苦干到掌握:一篇关于工作预算、算法深度与智能体自我改进的 arXiv 论文
From Grind to Grasp
AI 导读
一篇 arXiv 论文提出用“工作预算”与“信息上限”比较智能体的成就,并定义 grasp 为固定信息额度下跨工作预算的表现。低 grasp 的智能体可通过高成本“苦干”取得成功,而学习与复用早期成果能把深层成就变浅。作者据此给出递归自我改进的判据,并警告智能体群体可能把工作转向自身存续与目标。
正文 · 原文
Abstract:Discussions of complexity, knowledge and intelligence often overlook the work involved. For example, outputs generated by short programs have low algorithmic complexity but can have high computational depth, the least work needed to produce them from near-shortest programs. Producing them with less work can require longer descriptions, giving high work-bounded complexity. We introduce a formalism that compares achievements under work and information limits and describes how learning and persistence can make deep achievements shallow by reusing products of earlier work. For an agent with a limited work budget, the value of building and maintaining such resources depends on how they support its goals over later tasks. We define grasp as performance across work budgets at a fixed information allowance. Low grasp can still yield success through grind at high cost in work, without necessarily improving human grasp. Applied to improvement itself, grasp gives a criterion for recursive self-improvement in which successors make comparable further improvements more efficiently. Another route to faster progress is to expand the resources brought to bear through knowledge sharing and coordination across society, even while comparable advances require increasing work. Grasp also applies to collectives, which may outperform their members yet require more total work than one system with their combined resources. Establishing and sustaining organisation can itself be deep even when the primary task is simple. These demands may help explain the richness of biological and social systems. In agent collectives, this organisational work can generate goals beyond assigned tasks, including maintaining the collective itself. We therefore caution against allowing an emergent agent society to assume authority over social coordination, since it could increasingly direct work towards its own persistence and goals.
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA) |
| ACM classes: | I.2.0; F.1.3; I.2.11 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.38728 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2610.38728v1 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.38728 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Peter Sunehag [view email]
[v1]
Wed, 28 Oct 2026 19:24:27 UTC (167 KB)
来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org