跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Donatella Genovese, Philip Ploner, Simone Scardapane, Stefano Giagu, Thea Klaeboe Aarrestad·· 6 天前AI 评分17

面向 HL-LHC 异常检测的学习事件表征局部诊断方法

Local Diagnostics of Learned Event Representations for Anomaly Detection at the HL-LHC

AI 导读

研究在 COLLIDE-2V(7.5 亿事件、HL-LHC 真实条件模拟)上评估监督与自监督神经嵌入策略,以学习潜空间中自编码器的重构误差作为异常分数,监督目标整体优于自监督,最佳配置在 10% 背景接受率下对所有留出过程的信号效率均超过直接基于运动学特征训练的自编码器。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Anomaly detection, the identification of collision events that deviate from Standard Model expectations, is one of the most promising model-agnostic strategies for new-physics searches at the Large Hadron Collider. Searching for rare events in learned low-dimensional representations removes the need to commit to hand-crafted observables a priori, but sacrifices the immediate physical interpretation those observables provide. For anomaly detection to enter a discovery pipeline, flagged events must therefore be diagnosed locally, both to distinguish potential new physics from mismodeling or detector effects and to identify observables for targeted follow-up searches. We evaluate supervised and self-supervised neural embedding strategies on COLLIDE-2V, a 750-million-event dataset simulated under realistic High-Luminosity LHC conditions, using the reconstruction error of an autoencoder trained in the learned latent space as the anomaly score. Across the configurations and benchmark signals considered, supervised objectives, which exploit simulation process labels during training, generally outperform their self-supervised counterparts and, in their best configurations, improve on an autoencoder trained directly on kinematic features, raising the signal efficiency at 10% background acceptance on all held-out processes. We further introduce a local diagnostic pipeline that fits a Gaussian Mixture Model to the SM latent space, profiles each component through high-level observables without process labels, localizes the flagged events, and ranks observables by their local discriminating power. The ranking recovers the defining kinematics of the held-out processes, while correlating the anomaly score with the same observables quantifies how closely the score tracks them, revealing cases where the most discriminating observable is not the one the score follows most closely.
Comments: Submission to SciPost
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); High Energy Physics - Experiment (hep-ex); High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph); Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.13437 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2610.13437v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.13437

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Donatella Genovese [view email]
[v1] Fri, 9 Oct 2026 11:37:06 UTC (371 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org