arXiv cs.AI· Utsav Poudel, Anuj Nepal, Vyas Viswanath, Subramaniyaswamy Vairavasundaram·· 2 天前AI 评分21
量子与经典机器学习在神经精神疾病分类中的对比:一项特征匹配的多队列评估
Quantum Versus Classical Machine Learning for Neuropsychiatric Disorders: A Feature-Matched Multi-Cohort Evaluation
AI 导读
研究在四个公开队列(4,308 名受试者)上以相同相关性特征对比六类量子模型与经典模型,量子核与匹配经典核在四个队列上均无统计显著差异,平均准确率差距在 95% 置信度下不超过 1.4 个百分点。
正文 · 原文
Abstract:Resting-state functional connectivity is widely used in machine learning-based classification of neuropsychiatric disorders. Quantum machine learning models have been proposed for functional connectivity data, but few studies have evaluated them under leave-site-out validation or against matched classical models. We compared six quantum model families with classical ones using identical correlation-derived features across four public cohorts (4,308 subjects). Leave-site-out validation was used for the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange (ABIDE I), ADHD-200 (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder), and REST-meta-MDD (major depressive disorder) cohorts, while the UCLA Consortium for Neuropsychiatric Phenomics (UCLA-CNP) was evaluated using stratified 10-fold cross-validation. The quantum kernel was statistically indistinguishable from a matched classical kernel across all four cohorts, with the average accuracy difference within 1.4 percentage points at 95% confidence. On ABIDE I, a hybrid quantum convolutional network achieved similar accuracy to its classical counterpart (0.645 vs. 0.641), while a trainable quantum kernel exceeded its classical counterpart by 0.064 in area under the curve (AUC). Quantum convolutional networks also achieved higher AUC than their matched classical networks on this cohort and showed smaller train-test gaps on all four cohorts, without an accuracy gain. Overall, most quantum models matched their classical counterparts, but none consistently outperformed them. This study, among the first quantum evaluations of ABIDE I under leave-site-out validation, provides a feature-matched benchmark of quantum and classical models comprising 284 matched comparisons. We further analyse fidelity-based graph construction and account for the observed quantum-classical parity through effective-dimension and eigenspectrum analyses.
| Comments: | 19 pages, 10 figures, 7 tables. Submitted to IEEE. Code and per-fold results: this https URL |
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.21344 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2610.21344v1 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.21344 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Utsav Poudel [view email]
[v1]
Thu, 15 Oct 2026 06:28:10 UTC (6,336 KB)
来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org