跳到正文
arXiv cs.CL· Amit Kumar Jaiswal, Sagar Uprety, Prayag Tiwari·· 6 天前AI 评分22

SAFE-QE:用子序列关联过滤与广度感知选择追踪并抑制 LLM 查询扩展中的幻觉词

Tracing and Taming Hallucinated Terms via Subsequence-Association Filtering and Breadth-Aware Selection for LLM Query Expansion

AI 导读

研究者提出 SAFE-QE,一种免训练、与检索器无关的查询扩展方法,通过语料条件下的跨上下文可复现性对候选扩展词打分,将随机查询上下文中反复出现但伪相关集不支持的词判定为幻觉关联产物并降权。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are now a standard source of query expansion terms but they hallucinate. They inject non existent entities and off-topic terms that add ranking noise and can hurt strong retrievers. Existing remedies such as corpus grounding, mutual verification and preference alignment treat hallucinated terms as an undifferentiated nuisance to be filtered by agreement heuristics, without a mechanistic account of why a given term appears or a principled criterion for how many terms to keep. We propose Subsequence-Association Filtered, breadth-aware query expansion (SAFE-QE), a training-free, retriever agnostic method that draws on the subsequence-association account of hallucination. We score each candidate expansion term by its corpus conditioned cross-context reproducibility, terms that reappear under randomised query contexts yet lack support in the pseudo-relevant set are flagged as products of dominant hallucinatory associations and down-weighted. Drawing on the characterisation of language generation as a trade-off between consistency (no hallucination) and breadth (coverage), we cast term selection as constrained coverage maximisation over the pseudo-relevant set, keeping a set that is approximately broad but consistent and stable across resampling. We also introduce the Hallucinated Expansion Term Rate, a query side faithfulness metric that counts injected expansion terms no relevant document supports. We evaluate our approach on benchmarked TREC and BEIR collections. Our SAFE-QE is statistically indistinguishable from generative and corpus-steered expansion on nDCG@10 while injecting fewer unsupported terms 4.3 per query against 27.8 for Query2doc and 57.5 for HyDE and on a strong learned sparse retriever, where every expansion method regresses. Faithfulness is therefore available at no measurable cost in ranking quality.
Subjects: Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.13810 [cs.IR]
  (or arXiv:2610.13810v1 [cs.IR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.13810

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Sagar Uprety [view email]
[v1] Fri, 9 Oct 2026 16:22:16 UTC (1,365 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.CL · arxiv.org