arXiv cs.AI· Meiling Li, Pietro Bongini, Benedetta Tondi, Mauro Barni·· 14 小时前AI 评分22
免训练合成图像归因中的表征与参考选择
Representation and Reference Selection in Training-Free Synthetic Image Attribution
AI 导读
研究分析了免训练参考式合成图像归因中表征空间与参考构建方式的交互作用,使用 CLIP 和 DINOv2 不同层提取的表征及三种语义约束程度的参考选择策略。结果显示归因准确率通常在中间表征层达到峰值,语义约束参考可减少查询-参考不匹配,在参考预算有限时重合成参考更有效,而中等规模参考池下语义对齐参考的精度-成本权衡更优。
正文 · 原文
Abstract:Synthetic image attribution aims at identifying the generator responsible for a given AI-generated image. Training-free reference-based attribution methods are easily scalable, since newly emerging generators can be incorporated by adding source-specific references rather than retraining a task-specific classifier. Their performance depends on two coupled factors: the representation space used for comparison and the way source-specific references are constructed. However, the interaction between these two factors remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we provide a controlled analysis of this interaction using references and off-the-shelf pretrained representations. We study representations extracted from different layers of CLIP and DINOv2, along with three reference selection strategies with varying semantic constraints: arbitrary, semantically aligned, and resynthesis-based references. Our results show that attribution accuracy generally peaks at intermediate representation levels, indicating that source-discriminative cues are more accessible before strong semantic abstraction dominates. We further show that intermediate representations are not completely semantically neutral, making reference selection critical: semantically constrained references reduce query-reference mismatch and improve attribution, especially under limited reference budgets. Resynthesis is useful in low-reference regimes, while semantically aligned references provide a better accuracy-cost trade-off when a moderate-sized reference pool is available. Our findings show that training-free reference-based attribution should be understood as the interaction between where images are compared, how the reference set is constructed, and how many references are available. Code and datasets are available at this https URL.
| Comments: | 6 pages, 5 figures, 4 tables. Accepted at the 2026 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS 2026) |
| Subjects: | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2607.12052 [cs.CV] |
| (or arXiv:2607.12052v2 [cs.CV] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.12052 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Meiling Li [view email]
[v1]
Mon, 13 Jul 2026 18:10:39 UTC (1,130 KB)
[v2]
Wed, 28 Oct 2026 07:28:27 UTC (1,145 KB)
来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org