Artificial Analysis 编程智能体指数升级至 v2.1，Claude Fable 5.2 与 Claude Opus 5.5 并列榜首

Artificial Analysis· @ArtificialAnlys · X·2026-11-14 08:04· 50 分钟前AI 评分47

AI 导读

Artificial Analysis 发布 Coding Agent Index v2.1，将 FrontierCode 升级至 2.0、Terminal-Bench 升级至 4.1。

正文 · 原文

Announcing Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.1, upgrading FrontierCode and Terminal-Bench. Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Opus 5.5 share the lead at 58

The Coding Agent Index measures models in agent harnesses; v2.1 of the Index upgrades FrontierCode from 1.1 to 2.0 and Terminal-Bench from 4.0 to 4.1.

Upgraded:

• FrontierCode-AA 2.0 (replacing FrontierCode v1.1): our implementation of Cognition's FrontierCode 2.0, comprising 132 real-world coding tasks graded on whether a repository maintainer would merge the agent's change
• Terminal-Bench 4.1 (replacing Terminal-Bench 4.0): the same 66 tasks, scored with updated verifiers that improve reliability and resistance to reward hacking

Staying in the Index: SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA

Key results:

• Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Opus 5.5 share the lead at 58: Claude Fable 5.2 scores 58 at both xhigh and high in Claude Code. Claude Opus 5.5 (max) scores 58 in Claude Code and, paired with GPT-6 Luna High, in Cognition's multi-model harness Devin Fusion CLI. Claude Fable 5.2 (max) scores 56 as more of its attempts hit task time limits. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max, 56) in Claude Code and Gemini 4 Carbon (high, 55) in Antigravity CLI follow
• Index scores are lower in v2.1, driven by the upgrade to FrontierCode-AA 2.0: models score lower by 5 points on average. Codex with GPT-6.1 Terra (max) is the only configuration which didn’t fall between versions, sitting within 1 point of its prior score
• Cost per task varies ~30x among configurations scoring 48+: from $1.51 for Codex with GPT-6.1 Sol (max, 52) to $44.22 for Claude Code with Claude Fable 5.2 (max, 56)

来源：Artificial Analysis · x.com