跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Mingyang Liu, Qingcan Kang, Shixiong Kai, Tao Zhong, Mingxuan Yuan, Xin Li, Linqi Song·· 1 天前AI 评分41

Verify–Backtrack Loop:面向长程语言智能体的结构化前置条件恢复方法

Verify--Backtrack Loop: Structured Precondition Recovery for Long-Horizon Language Agents

AI 导读

研究者提出 Verify–Backtrack Loop(VBL),一种无需训练的 ReAct 扩展,用有界目标栈维护任务分解,并在目标激活、执行失败或状态变化时联合校验"当前目标是否服务于最终目标"与"当前状态下是否可行",配合类型化失败归因触发 Push、Pop、重试或 BacktrackTo 父目标。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Language agents increasingly tackle long-horizon tasks in interactive environments, where actions often depend on latent preconditions. The core difficulty is not trajectory length but recovery: when a prerequisite is missing or an earlier decomposition fails, trying another plausible action rarely helps. ReAct and later reflection or adaptive-planning methods support local correction, but express recovery as free-form text, with no explicit control state linking the terminal goal, the active goal, and the failure source. We introduce the Verify--Backtrack Loop (VBL), a training-free extension of ReAct that turns precondition discovery and failure diagnosis into structured planning-state updates. VBL maintains the task decomposition as a bounded goal stack and, on goal activation, execution failure, or material state change, jointly verifies two horizons---whether the active goal contributes to the terminal goal and whether it is feasible in the current state. These dual-horizon judgments, combined with typed failure attribution, trigger explicit operations---Push, Pop, retry, or BacktrackTo the parent. We evaluate VBL with Qwen3.5-9B, GPT-4o, and DeepSeek-V3.2 on AppWorld, ALFWorld, and ScienceWorld. VBL improves over ReAct and reflection-based control on every backbone--benchmark pair. On the challenging AppWorld setting, it improves task success by up to 22.07 percentage points over ReAct. Ablations show that removing either verification or diagnosis degrades performance, in several settings below ReAct, confirming that the two mechanisms are complementary. These results show that reliable long-horizon interaction benefits from revising the planning state, not merely the next action.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.41564 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2610.41564v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.41564

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Mingyang Liu [view email]
[v1] Fri, 30 Oct 2026 10:58:17 UTC (307 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org