跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Meng Ding, Mingxi Lei, Jie Zhang, Jinyan Liu, Di Wang·· 13 小时前AI 评分26

差分隐私稀疏奖励估计:基于偏好反馈的 Private Sparse RLHF 理论框架

Differentially Private Sparse Reward Estimation with Preference Feedback

AI 导读

研究提出 Private Sparse RLHF 问题,假设人类偏好由 s* ≪ d 个相关特征决定,首次为 Bradley-Terry-Luce 模型下基于成对偏好反馈的差分隐私稀疏奖励估计建立完整理论框架,并给出 Sample-DP 与 Label-DP 两种设定下的高效算法。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) has become a central paradigm for aligning Large Language Models with human values. However, the reliance on sensitive preference data necessitates rigorous differential privacy (DP) guarantees to prevent user information leakage. Existing private alignment methods typically assume dense reward parameterizations, resulting in estimation error bounds that scale polynomially with the ambient {model size $d$}. Such dependence is prohibitive in modern {overparameterized models} where $d$ is vast. In this work, we study \emph{Private Sparse RLHF} problem to address this limitation, assuming that human preferences (reward model) are governed by a subset of $s^* \ll d$ relevant features. We provide the first comprehensive theoretical framework for differentially private sparse reward estimation from pairwise preference feedback under the Bradley-Terry-Luce model, and introduce efficient algorithms for both Sample-DP and Label-DP settings. Theoretically, under the squared $\ell_2$ parameter estimation error, we establish upper bounds of $\widetilde{O}(s^*/n + {s^*}^2/n^2\varepsilon^2)$ for $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-Sample-DP and $\widetilde{O}(s^*/n + s^*/n\varepsilon^2)$ for $\varepsilon$-Label-DP based on randomized response, where $n$ is the training data size. For the lower bounds, we show that the Sample-DP rate is nearly optimal, and that the guarantee for our Label-DP method cannot be further improved within the randomized-response framework. We also provide a general lower bound for the problem with Label-DP. Empirically, our framework demonstrates superior efficacy over dense baselines across sentiment generation and safety alignment benchmarks, offering a significantly more favorable privacy-utility trade-off.
Comments: 36 pages
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.30099 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2610.30099v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.30099

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Meng Ding [view email]
[v1] Wed, 21 Oct 2026 17:45:42 UTC (96 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org