跳到正文
arXiv cs.CL· Xi Yang, Guodong Liu, Chuqin Li, Fan Wu, Ergin Soysal, Min Jiang, Xing He, Jiang Bian, Yi Guo, Shams Zaman, Thomas Fuchs, Yonghui Wu·· 13 小时前AI 评分31

小语言模型生物医学数据到文本生成的后训练对齐研究:以药品说明书为例

Exploring Post-Training Alignment of Small Language Models for Biomedical Data-to-Text Generation: A Case Study of Medication Leaflet

AI 导读

研究基于 Qwen-2.5 模型比较 SFT、DPO、ORPO、GRPO 四种后训练对齐方法在药品说明书生成上的效果,并构建源自 OpenFDA 药品标签的 FDALeaflets 数据集评估零样本跨监管泛化。

正文 · 原文

Authors:Xi Yang, Guodong Liu, Chuqin Li, Fan Wu, Ergin Soysal, Min Jiang, Xing He, Jiang Bian, Yi Guo, Shams Zaman, Thomas Fuchs, Yonghui Wu

View PDF

Abstract:Translating structured biomedical information into accurate, patient-friendly narratives remains a challenging biomedical data-to-text (D2T) task. While small language models (SLMs) are attractive for healthcare applications because of their lower computational cost, easier deployment, and improved data governance, the impact of post-training alignment on biomedical D2T generation has not been systematically studied. In this work, we compare four alignment methods: supervised fine-tuning (SFT), direct preference optimization (DPO), odds ratio preference optimization (ORPO), and group relative policy optimization (GRPO), using Qwen-2.5 models for medication leaflet generation. We further introduce FDALeaflets, a dataset derived from OpenFDA drug labels, to evaluate cross-regulatory generalization in a zero-shot setting. Selected aligned SLMs outperform GPT-5 on several reference-based metrics, whereas GPT-5 achieves better hallucination and adequacy scores on FDALeaflets under LLM-as-judge evaluation. Among RL-free alignment methods, ORPO achieves the best in-domain semantic performance, reaching a semantic textual similarity (STS) score of 0.9752. GRPO achieves the highest FDALeaflets STS (0.9407), exceeding GPT-5 (0.9295). These findings show that post-training alignment is a key factor in improving both semantic fidelity and generalization for biomedical D2T generation, while clinical safety and patient readability require human verification.
Comments: 8 pages, 1 figures
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.13430 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2607.13430v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.13430

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Xi Yang [view email]
[v1] Wed, 15 Jul 2026 04:22:25 UTC (606 KB)
[v2] Wed, 21 Oct 2026 15:03:37 UTC (493 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.CL · arxiv.org