跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Hanzhao Wang, Shengjie Liu, Zhengchao Wang·· 1 天前AI 评分34

AI 智能体何时该向人类提问?有限注意力下的澄清请求协调策略

When Should AI Agents Ask? Clarification Requests Under Limited Human Attention

AI 导读

研究提出 Pairwise Coordination Policy(PCP),用于协调多个共享同一人类注意力的 AI 智能体在何时搜索、提问或继续任务。PCP 在最多两个未解决需求时理论最优,全部需求需人类解决时成本不超过最优的两倍;在 864 个合成案例上平均成本差距仅 0.07%,相对三种标准提问规则降低 18-31% 成本。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:AI agents increasingly carry out delegated tasks in parallel, with one person overseeing several of them at once. In practice, an agent often lacks information its task requires, such as an unstated preference, constraint, or specification. It can ask the human to clarify, or it can search for the information itself, for example in past records, which takes time and effort and may fail. In this paper, we study how to coordinate these decisions across several agents that share one human with limited attention. We build a stylized model in which each agent can search, ask, or continue the parts of its task that do not depend on the missing information, and we formulate the problem as a dynamic program. We first show that whether an agent should ask depends on more than its own uncertainty: an agent with other work to do can be better off asking earlier, and which question the human should answer first depends on all waiting questions, so no ranking computed agent by agent is optimal. We then propose the Pairwise Coordination Policy (PCP), which uses exact one- and two-task problems to estimate how pairs of tasks delay each other when they share the human. Theoretically, PCP is exactly optimal when at most two requirements remain unresolved and costs at most twice the optimum when every unresolved requirement must be resolved by the human. We evaluate PCP on 864 synthetic cases and in a case study with LLM agents. On the synthetic benchmark, PCP's mean gap to optimal cost is 0.07%, and it reduces cost by an average of 18-31% relative to three standard rules for when to ask. In the LLM case study, agents completed every task correctly, and PCP achieved the lowest mean cost in all tested settings.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.41129 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2610.41129v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.41129

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Hanzhao Wang [view email]
[v1] Fri, 30 Oct 2026 01:36:07 UTC (378 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org