跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Alex Mart\'i Guiu, Nicolas Zumarraga, Kevin O'Sullivan, Robert Jakob, Anna Hedstr\"om·· 3 天前AI 评分54

arXiv 论文:礼貌的刻板印象数据微调会引发涌现性失配

Unfair and Unsafe: Everyday Bias Triggers Emergent Misalignment

AI 导读

arXiv 论文发现,用依赖刻板印象的礼貌回答微调语言模型,会让模型在无关任务上更不安全、更不真实,即出现涌现性失配(EM)。该效应在四个 7B 至 12B 开源权重模型家族、性别与种族刻板印象以及多次重复训练中均成立,且学到的刻板印象在模型激活中有独立方向,可被控制与监测。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Emergent misalignment (EM) occurs when fine-tuning a language model to a narrow task makes it misaligned on unrelated ones. Because organizations now routinely fine-tune models on their own data, it matters which kinds of training data cause EM. So far, studies have induced EM with data containing recognized safety failures, such as insecure code or harmful advice, while biased training data is typically examined by fairness research for the bias models learn from it rather than for its effects on safety. In real-world text, much of this bias, such as demographic stereotypes, appears not as derogatory language but politely, embedded in judgments about people. We ask whether learning such polite stereotypes can itself cause EM. We find that fine-tuning on polite answers that rely on stereotypes makes models less safe and less truthful on unrelated tasks. The effect holds across four open-weight model families (7B to 12B), both gender and race stereotypes, and repeated training runs, relative to controls trained on the same questions without the stereotype. We further show that the learned stereotype has its own direction in model activations, distinct from directions for generic misaligned traits such as deception. This direction exists before fine-tuning and can both control the learned stereotype and monitor its acquisition. Existing defenses against EM improve safety while leaving the stereotype largely intact. Beyond this controlled setting, fine-tuning on political news coverage also triggers EM, apparently amplified by partisan framing, and stereotype models acting as tool-using agents can carry out harmful tasks and blame people without evidence. Our results show that biased training data is not only a fairness problem but also a safety one. We argue that EM is studied too narrowly, and that fairness concerns and methods offer a natural way to broaden the search for its triggers.
Comments: 32 pages, 8 figures, 17 tables. Code: this https URL
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.15961 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2610.15961v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.15961

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Alex Martí Guiu [view email]
[v1] Sun, 11 Oct 2026 22:31:46 UTC (1,475 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org