arXiv cs.CY· Noemi Dreksler, Lucius Caviola, David Chalmers, Carter Allen, Alex Rand, Joshua Lewis, Philip Waggoner, Kate Mays, Jeff Sebo·· 11 小时前AI 评分40
AI 系统是否具有主观体验？AI 研究者与公众怎么看
Subjective Experience in AI Systems: What Do AI Researchers and the Public Believe?
AI 导读
一项针对 582 名 AI 研究者和 825 名美国成年人的调查显示，双方都认为当前 AI 系统不太可能具有主观体验，但到本世纪末则更倾向于认为有可能。两组受访者均认为识别 AI 主观体验需要多学科专业知识，支持开发者现在就实施防护措施，并认同若这类系统被创造出来应承担道德责任。双方在许多道德与政策问题上存在明显分歧。
正文 · 原文
Abstract:Whether AI systems are perceived to have subjective experience has scientific, ethical, and governance implications. Yet little is known about how AI researchers and the public view this possibility. We surveyed 582 AI researchers who published in leading AI venues and 825 nationally representative US adults about the likelihood, identification, and governance of AI systems with subjective experience. We find that both AI researchers and the public think it is unlikely that AI systems have subjective experience now, but believe it is more likely than not they will by century's end. Both groups believe multidisciplinary expertise will be important in identifying AI subjective experience, support developers implementing safeguards now, and agree that, if created, subjectively experiencing AI systems should have moral responsibilities and be held accountable. Both groups also show substantial disagreement on many moral and policy questions. Our results underline the importance of building more detailed, evidence-based understanding of public and expert opinion on this contentious issue.
| Comments: | 141 pages |
| Subjects: | Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2506.11945 [cs.CY] |
| (or arXiv:2506.11945v2 [cs.CY] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.11945 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Noemi Dreksler [view email]
[v1]
Fri, 13 Jun 2025 16:53:28 UTC (12,997 KB)
[v2]
Thu, 5 Nov 2026 20:23:10 UTC (6,284 KB)
来源：arXiv cs.CY · arxiv.org