跳到正文
arXiv cs.MA· Dmytro Babarytskyi·· 2 天前AI 评分18

学习之前先算可行性上限:无人机网状拦截的规模与时机边界

Feasibility Ceilings Before Learning: Sizing and Timing Bounds for Drone-Mesh Interception

AI 导读

针对 N 个智能体各覆盖半径 r 圆盘、需覆盖目标到达点概率密度的多智能体拦截问题,研究给出了不依赖策略的性能上限闭式解并经蒙特卡洛验证。在智能体间距至少 2r 时,平面覆盖率上限为 90.69%、体积为 74.05%,该上限源于分离约束而非问题本身,允许重叠后改用 Kershner 最薄覆盖密度即可突破,交叉点在 p=0.80。作者主张此类上限应在任何学习实验前计算,并与每个结果一同报告。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:A mesh of interceptors defending a fixed site must spread over the predicted arrival point of an approaching object. This is a recurring task in multi-agent robotics: N agents, each covering a disc of radius r, spread over a probability density so that a point drawn from it falls within some agent's disc. We give closed forms for the quantities that bound performance before any policy is chosen, and validate each by Monte Carlo. The uncertainty of a point predicted by extrapolating a noisy linear track follows from least-squares variance propagation plus a delta-method term for the uncertain arrival time, agreeing with simulation to within 1.8%. The coverage probability of a packed mesh admits a closed form accurate to 0.007 absolute, with a volumetric analogue. A naive area ratio misses a ceiling: while agents stay at least 2r apart, no mesh exceeds 90.69% coverage in the plane or 74.05% in a volume. This ceiling belongs to the separation constraint, not to the problem - permitting overlap substitutes Kershner's thinnest-covering density and removes it, the better regime above a crossover at p=0.80. Hexagonal packing is optimal among five arrangements; the centroidal-Voronoi configuration coverage control supplies reaches only half its coverage at small budgets. The Gaussian assumption is conservative under heavy tails and anisotropy but fragile under bias: a one-sigma aim-point offset costs 14 points of coverage. A repositioning team must also choose a commit time, and the admissible window can be empty. Against the applicable ceiling, analytic placement attains 85% of what the configuration permits while centralised PPO averages 15% over three trainer seeds, with a paired bootstrap against a null policy containing zero at every seed. We argue such ceilings should be computed before any learning experiment and quoted alongside every result.
Comments: 13 pages, 6 figures, 8 tables. Code, data and policy checkpoints: this https URL
Subjects: Robotics (cs.RO); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
MSC classes: 68T40, 52C15, 52C17, 62J05
ACM classes: I.2.9; I.2.11; G.3
Cite as: arXiv:2610.20823 [cs.RO]
  (or arXiv:2610.20823v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20823

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Dmytro Babarytskyi [view email]
[v1] Wed, 14 Oct 2026 19:09:35 UTC (458 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.MA · arxiv.org