arXiv cs.AI· Xu Shen, Lingyong Yan, Shuaiqiang Wang, Jianmin Wu, Zhikai Chen, Jiliang Tang, Jie Ren·· 14 小时前AI 评分38
GAD:面向长时程任务的目标感知动态多智能体协作
Goal-Aware Dynamic Multi-Agent Collaboration for Long-Horizon Tasks
AI 导读
针对 LLM 智能体在长时程任务中验证发生偏晚、共享上下文里职责相关信息被稀释的问题,研究者提出目标感知动态多智能体协作方法 GAD,用不断生长的执行图组织子任务及其依赖关系。每个智能体上下文保留原始指令与所分配任务的目标和验收条件,并可按执行证据拆分任务、指定依赖以决定工作时机与结果接收范围,验证与恢复环节则对照目标检查子任务结果和整体完成度。
正文 · 原文
Abstract:LLM-based agents are increasingly used to complete complex, long-horizon tasks without human intervention. To make progress toward the task goal, agents need to perform different duties, such as planning and verification, when needed. To understand how single agents manage these duties during long-horizon execution, we conduct a preliminary study. Our analysis shows that verification has the strongest association with task success, but often occurs late, leaving limited opportunities for correction. We also find that the proportion of duty-relevant information decreases as records from different duties accumulate in a shared context. These findings lead us to examine whether multi-agent systems (MAS) can address these problems by assigning duties to agents with separate contexts. Our analysis shows that this separation alone is insufficient. Agents can lose track of the overall goal and repeat prior investigations. They may also lack necessary background while receiving irrelevant information from others. To maintain goal awareness and coordinate collaboration as task needs change, we propose Goal-Aware Dynamic Multi-Agent Collaboration (GAD). It uses a growing execution graph to organize subtasks and their dependencies. To keep agents focused on their goals, each context retains the original instruction and the assigned task's goal and acceptance conditions. To adapt collaboration and information sharing during execution, agents can divide tasks into subtasks and specify dependencies based on execution evidence. These dependencies guide when agents work and which results they receive. Verification and recovery check subtask results and full task completion against their goals, providing feedback for repair when checks fail.
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2610.39193 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2610.39193v1 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.39193 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Xu Shen [view email]
[v1]
Thu, 29 Oct 2026 02:15:35 UTC (311 KB)
来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org