跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Alina Nesen, Prathyusha Kanmanth Reddy, David Relyea, Rohit Avinash Mujumdar, Samaneh Karimi, Bo Shen, Jordan Hashemi·· 12 小时前AI 评分33

MOSS:面向搜索与推荐系统语义故障监控与诊断的生产框架

MOSS: A Production Framework for Monitoring and Diagnosing Semantic Failures in Search and Recommendation Systems

AI 导读

研究团队提出生产框架 MOSS(Model Sanity Service),将基于 LLM 的相关性打分嵌入循环监控流程,结合定向采样、策略感知提示词、结构化告警与根因诊断提示,用于捕捉搜索和推荐系统的语义故障。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Detecting semantic failures in production recommendation and search systems is hard: behavioral metrics lag by days, manual review does not scale, and most LLM evaluation frameworks are designed for offline, fixed datasets rather than continuous operational monitoring. We present Model Sanity Service (MOSS), a production framework that addresses this operational gap by embedding LLM-based relevance scoring into a recurring monitoring loop with targeted sampling, strategy-aware prompting, structured alerting, and diagnostic follow-up prompting that categorizes failures into actionable root causes.
MOSS has been running in production at a large U.S. retailer for over six months across recommendation, search, and offer surfaces, and has surfaced two confirmed serving defects. For one of these, a backfill blending defect, MOSS quantified the impact of the proposed fix offline as a 76.4\% relative reduction in alert rate. On a 498-pair human-annotated recommendation benchmark, frontier LLM judges achieve higher F1 and AUC point estimates than non-LLM baselines (internal production embeddings and SBERT), with the largest gains on strategy-dependent tasks requiring intent-level relational reasoning. The same judge, score scale, and threshold transfer to a 466-pair search benchmark spanning 21 queries with only a surface-specific prompt adaptation, achieving strong F1 and AUC without retuning. These results show that a single LLM monitoring framework can provide useful, actionable quality signals across multiple product discovery surfaces in a large-scale e-commerce setting.
Comments: 10 pages. A prior version of this work was presented at the non-archival Unified Search and Recommendation Workshop (USRW), co-located with ACM RecSys 2026. This manuscript is currently under review at IEEE BigData 2026
Subjects: Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.26902 [cs.IR]
  (or arXiv:2610.26902v1 [cs.IR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.26902

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Alina Nesen [view email]
[v1] Fri, 16 Oct 2026 21:26:06 UTC (780 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org