Claude Code 团队如何做代码审查：Addy Osmani 等人谈"人类是否读过代码"是伪命题

Quoting Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang

AI 导读

Claude Code 团队的 Addy Osmani、Morgan Westlee Lunt 和 Qing Wang 认为，"人类是否读过代码"是判断变更风险的伪命题，真正该问的是"这次改动可能出什么问题、该由哪种检查（自动或人工）来抓"。这一转变让审查从 PR 末尾的关卡变成持续进行的过程，多数改动在被人类查看前已由 Claude 至少审查并修复过一次，从而把团队注意力留给更高层次的问题。

正文 · 原文

16th October 2026

We think "did a human read the code?" is an imprecise proxy for "what could go wrong with this change, and which check—automated or human—is the right one to catch it?"

Asking that question also changed when review happens. Before, review was a gate at the end of the road: write the code, open a PR, wait for your colleague.

Now, review runs continuously, more like spellcheck while you write. Most changes have been reviewed and fixed by Claude at least once before a human is asked to look. This catches most routine mistakes, and saves team attention for higher-level questions and scrutiny.

— Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang, How the Claude Code team does code review

来源：Simon Willison · simonwillison.net