跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Qi Wang, Kang Xu, Chengcheng Wan, Jiangtao Wang·· 1 天前AI 评分48

RECAST:无需隐藏推理通道,从 Claude-Sonnet-5.5 等闭源模型重建思维链

RECAST: REconstruction of Chain-of-Thought via Auditable Structured Traces

AI 导读

RECAST 提出一种基于重建的框架,仅凭问题和目标模型的最终答案,就能重建第一人称结构化推理链并清洗为 SFT-ready 数据,无需依赖隐藏推理通道。研究复现三种主流 CoT 提取方法,在 Claude-Sonnet-5.5 标准 chat-completions 接口上均返回零 CoT token,原因是推理字段缺失、具名工具选择被拒、自由文本草稿参数被过滤。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Large closed-source reasoning models expose only their final answers. The intermediate reasoning that produces those answers is hidden behind API surfaces, tool-call policies, and safety filters. Existing chain-of-thought (CoT) extraction methods assume a side channel: a visible reasoning field, a scratchpad carried through tool calls, or a signed/encrypted reasoning block. We reproduce three representative state-of-the-art extraction methods and find that, on Claude-Sonnet-5.5 accessed through the standard chat-completions interface, all three return zero CoT tokens. The failure is structural rather than a bug: the reasoning field is absent, named tool selection is rejected, free-text scratchpad arguments are filtered, and no replayable reasoning block is exposed. We therefore take a different route. We present RECAST, a reconstruction-based framework that conditions a decoder on the question and the target model's final answer, reconstructs a first-person structured rationale, cleans it, and builds SFT-ready data. To the best of our knowledge, RECAST is the first system to reconstruct CoT from frontier closed models such as Claude-Sonnet-5.5, GPT-6.1, and Gemini 3 without using hidden reasoning channels. We instantiate RECAST on Claude-Sonnet-5.5 and additionally obtain successful qualitative reconstructions on GPT-6.1 and Gemini 3 with the same answer-only protocol. The system is open-source and packaged as an agent skill: one prompt deploys it and runs the complete pipeline to produce SFT-ready CoT data. This preprint describes the system, its threat model, and a controlled artifact validation; it does not claim large-scale benchmark improvements.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.41813 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2610.41813v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.41813

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Qi Wang [view email]
[v1] Fri, 30 Oct 2026 14:36:12 UTC (35 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org