跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Sheethal Bhat, Mahfuzur Rahman Chowdhury, Imam Ahmed Shaik, Rose Dawn Bharath, Siming Bayer, Andreas Maier·· 13 小时前AI 评分24

ADNI 静息态 fMRI 认知预测中的个体化功能网络归因有多可靠?

How Reliable Is Individualized Functional-Network Attribution in Resting-State fMRI Cognitive Prediction in ADNI?

AI 导读

研究评估了 ADNI 中 N=875 名受试者上冻结的 Schaefer-200 功能连接预测器(预测 MMSE/ADAS-Cog13)的逐受试者网络消融归因可靠性。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Individualized attribution estimates which functional networks drive a model prediction for a given subject and is often proposed as an interpretable resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) biomarker, but its test-retest reliability is rarely quantified. We evaluate per-subject network-ablation attribution for a frozen resting-state functional connectivity (FC) predictor (Schaefer-200 FC predicting MMSE/ADAS-Cog13) trained on N=875 subjects from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), using, and (iii) a subject-level permutation null. Split-half reliability is near-ceiling (Spearman p=0.948/0.950) but drops on scan-rescan (p=0.609/0.616). Under the mismatched-subject null, correlations remain substantial (p~0.46-0.47), indicating strong population-shared structure, yet matched pairs exceed this null (z~6.6-6.9, p<=10-4). Thus, in ADNI, individualized network attribution contains a modest but non-zero person-specific component atop a strong population-shared pattern. We recommend reporting scan-rescan reliability together with a permutation-null control, rather than within-session proxies alone, to avoid overstating individual specificity.
Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.37472 [cs.CV]
  (or arXiv:2610.37472v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.37472

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Sheethal Bhat [view email]
[v1] Tue, 27 Oct 2026 16:04:54 UTC (442 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org