arXiv cs.AI· Qiufeng Li, Chengxuan Wang, Rongqian Chen, Quan Cheng, Yihui Ren, Chia-Tung Ho, David Z. Pan, Tian Lan, Weidong Cao·· 12 小时前AI 评分34
PlaceReasoner-Beta:推理驱动的宏单元布局与基准测试
PlaceReasoner-Beta: Reasoning-Driven Macro Placement and Benchmarking
AI 导读
PlaceReasoner-Beta 是一个验证器引导的多智能体框架,将 VLSI 宏单元布局重构为闭环推理问题,由 VLM 规划器生成候选布局,几何验证器与物理验证器逐级筛选,再用布线后优化器按最终 PPA 改进。
正文 · 原文
Abstract:Automated macro placement remains a fundamental challenge in VLSI physical design. Despite decades of research, existing approaches predominantly optimize hand-crafted proxy objectives, such as estimated wirelength, and typically produce placements through one-shot numerical optimization, limiting their ability to incorporate visual layout context, codified design expertise, and downstream physical-design feedback in a unified loop. We present PlaceReasoner-Beta, a verifier-guided multi-agent framework that reformulates macro placement as a closed-loop reasoning problem rather than black-box optimization. A vision-language model (VLM) planner generates candidate placements from the floorplan image, macro specifications, and connectivity structure; a geometric verifier enforces physical legality and expert placement principles; a physical verifier refines candidates using early implementation feedback; and a post-route optimizer further improves promising layouts using final PPA. To enable reproducible evaluation, we introduce PlaceReasoner-Bench, a fully open end-to-end benchmark built from open RTL designs, EDA tools, and technology libraries. It comprises 8 designs at two aspect ratios, yielding 16 tasks with fixed floorplans and I/O assignments, so methods differ only in macro positions and orientations and are evaluated using routed PPA and DRC rather than pre-route proxies. Across the benchmark, PlaceReasoner-Beta achieves the best timing among DRC-clean methods on all square tasks, reducing post-route TNS by 61.2% at 1:1 and 53.0% at 2:1 relative to the classical baseline field. It also shortens routed wirelength on most designs despite never explicitly optimizing it, demonstrating that reasoning over spatial structure under physical-design feedback can improve end-to-end layout quality beyond proxy-objective optimization.
| Comments: | Code and benchmark are available at \url{this https URL} |
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.21263 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2609.21263v2 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.21263 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
Submission history
From: Qiufeng Li [view email]
[v1]
Fri, 18 Sep 2026 03:22:09 UTC (1,886 KB)
[v2]
Thu, 22 Oct 2026 20:33:14 UTC (1,973 KB)
来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org