跳到正文
RadarAI· X:面壁智能 OpenBMB (@OpenBMB)·· 4 小时前AI 评分38

面壁 MiniCPM5 2B 实测:工具调用与长上下文领先,完整智能体任务不及 Raon-1 nano

面壁 MiniCPM5 2B 在用户实测中工具调用与长上下文领先

AI 导读

用户 @PaulGug 在 RTX 3080 上实测 5 个小模型,面壁 MiniCPM5 2B 在工具调用(99%)和长上下文(92%)上领先,但完整智能体任务得分 150/300,低于 Raon-1 nano 的 163。

正文 · 原文

OpenBMB· @OpenBMB · X·2026-11-13 09:27· 1 小时前AI 评分52

AI 导读

面壁智能 OpenBMB 转发用户 @PaulGug 对 Raon-1 nano 等 5 个小模型的本地智能体实测,并致谢社区测试。实测中 MiniCPM5 2B 在工具调用(99%)和长上下文(92%)上领先,但完整智能体任务总分(150/300)低于 Raon-1 nano 的 163;Raon-1 nano 完成 96/96 次测试、约 187 tok/s,作者更推荐它做多步智能体工作,MiniCPM5 2B 适合工具密集或长上下文场景,实测在 RTX 3080 上进行且量化档位不同,非受控榜单。

正文 · 原文

Thanks for the detailed real-world testing! 💙 Great to see MiniCPM5 2B performing so well on tool calling and long-context tasks. Love seeing the community explore where different small models shine! 🙌

引用GooGZ AI@PaulGug

Raon-1 nano follow-up. @Krafton_AI's launch chart was confident, so I put it through my personal-agent tests against the four other small models cited (on my RTX 3080).

Short version: Two models came out on top, each in a different way.

Full agent tasks, reasoning off (PA Core, out of 300):

  • @Krafton_AI Raon-1 nano: 163
  • MiniCPM5 2B: 150
  • LFM3 1.7B: 149
  • Gemma 4 E2B: 124
  • Qwen 3.5 2B: 114

Individual skills, reasoning off:

  • @OpenBMB's MiniCPM5 leads on tool calling (99%) and long context (92%)
  • Raon is solid but lower (86% and 75%), with strong instruction following (93%)

So the model that's best at the individual skills wasn't the one that did best on the full agent tasks.

Raon-1 nano is the pick for multi-step agent work. It finished all 96 attempts with zero failures, runs at ~187 tok/s, and is ~2GB at Q4.

MiniCPM5 2B is the pick for tool-heavy or long-context work, where it was the most accurate small model I tested.

With reasoning on, most in this class run out of thinking budget on the agent tasks, so for a responsive local agent I'd run either with reasoning off.

(NB: Not a controlled leaderboard: Raon is 3.2B total (~1.6B core) at Q4, and MiniCPM5 ran at Q8. It's the best each managed on my setup. LFM3 also has the known '</think>' tag issue, so those results are omitted)

Amazing how far 2B class intelligence has come along. Nice work @Krafton_AI - Let's get this into the upstream llama build! (and shout-out to @OpenBMB also).👏

在 X 查看被引用的帖子

来源:OpenBMB · x.com

来源:RadarAI · aihot.news