跳到正文
arXiv cs.AI· Jaewoo Park, Minyoung Lee, Sukmin Seo, Moonbin Yim, Hyunwook Yoon, Dohoon Ryu, Daehee Kim, Myungseo Song, Jihyuk Byun, Seunggyu Chang, Taeho Kil, Jiseob Kim, Bado Lee, Geewook Kim·· 2 天前AI 评分38

DroneCATS 基准:多模态 LLM 作为通用视觉-语言-动作智能体控制无人机

Evaluating Multimodal LLMs as Generalist Vision-Language-Action Agents for Drone Control: Commanding, Approaching, Tracking and Searching

AI 导读

研究者提出 DroneCATS 基准,让 MLLM 通过四类动作直接控制无人机,覆盖目标可见性、目标运动、场景与模拟器变化,并扩展至真实无人机、多无人机及"指挥官+子智能体"套件,评测了十款从前沿到小型开源的 MLLM。

正文 · 原文

Authors:Jaewoo Park, Minyoung Lee, Sukmin Seo, Moonbin Yim, Hyunwook Yoon, Dohoon Ryu, Daehee Kim, Myungseo Song, Jihyuk Byun, Seunggyu Chang, Taeho Kil, Jiseob Kim, Bado Lee, Geewook Kim

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly used to make decisions for drones, but existing evaluations are mostly limited to simulation, to a single drone, and to targets that are visible from the start and do not move. We present DroneCATS, a benchmark in which the MLLM alone controls the drone through four actions, and evaluate ten MLLMs from frontier models to small open models. The benchmark varies target visibility, target motion, scene and simulator, and extends to real drones. Beyond a single drone, it adds a multi-drone suite, where one model drives multiple drones, and a commander + sub-agents suite, where a commander model directs one sub-agent for each of the drones. Across these settings, we find that frontier models achieve the highest success rates, but their latency causes them to lose moving targets, while small open models often do not declare arrival even when they reach the target. Guided by this failure analysis, we fine-tune a 2B model on drone action data synthesized from public RGB-D images; its success rate rises from 0% to 31% in simulation and outperforms the frontier models in real flight. With multiple drones, we find that every zero-shot model succeeds more often as the commander of one sub-agent per drone than when it drives all of them from one context, and that commanding success follows general VLM ability. On real drones, we observe that the results broadly follow those in simulation, while latency and hardware limits matter more. We will fully open-source the benchmark.
Comments: Preprint. Project page: this https URL
Subjects: Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.01404 [cs.RO]
  (or arXiv:2609.01404v2 [cs.RO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.01404

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Geewook Kim [view email]
[v1] Tue, 1 Sep 2026 15:27:43 UTC (25,907 KB)
[v2] Thu, 15 Oct 2026 10:07:37 UTC (8,503 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org