跳到正文
arXiv cs.MA· Jusheng Zhang, Xuekun Wu, Wenhao Wang, Mark Wang, Ming-Hsuan Yang·· 12 小时前AI 评分31

Markets of Minds:面向 512 亿状态智能体经济的专家推理分配框架

Markets of Minds: A 51-Billion-State Economy of Intelligence

AI 导读

研究者提出 Markets of Minds 框架,在专家输出被观察到之前,就为智能体分配专家推理资源,并联合清算受共享资源约束的协助合约。该框架在一个覆盖能力、认知预算、服务商访问、稀缺性与网络角色的 512 亿可寻址人格-市场状态经济体中建模。

正文 · 原文

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:When intelligence is shared, reasoning becomes a constrained allocation problem. In a population of agents with limited access to expert models, an intervention can benefit its recipient yet still be a poor use of shared capacity if another feasible intervention has greater expected value. Assistance must therefore be evaluated through both its marginal benefit and the opportunity cost induced by budgets, access, scarcity, and service capacity. To this end, we introduce Markets of Minds, a framework for allocating expert reasoning across agents before expert outputs are observed. For each feasible agent-service pair, the framework estimates the expected gain from assistance relative to the agent's default continuation, explicitly separating repair benefit from regression risk, and jointly clears assistance contracts under shared resource constraints. We then study this problem in a dependency-aware agent economy with 51.2 billion addressable persona-market states spanning capabilities, cognitive budgets, provider access, scarcity, and network roles. These dependencies couple allocation feasibility across agents rather than the outcome of a fixed contract. Empirically, in a matched replay of 240 cases under a common 30% assistance quota, the frozen allocator reaches 85.42% task-level persona adherence versus 73.86% for equal-capacity random allocation, a gain of 11.56 percentage points. The results show that assistance value is heterogeneous and can be negative, and that scarcity changes which interventions are worth purchasing. Together, these findings motivate a population-level view of intelligence where the value of assistance depends not only on what it can achieve, but also on which alternative uses of scarce cognitive capacity it displaces.
Subjects: Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
Cite as: arXiv:2610.32190 [cs.MA]
  (or arXiv:2610.32190v1 [cs.MA] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.32190

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Wenhao Wang [view email]
[v1] Fri, 23 Oct 2026 05:36:29 UTC (1,868 KB)

来源:arXiv cs.MA · arxiv.org