arXiv cs.AI· Ahana Biswas, Yu-Ru Lin·· 12 小时前AI 评分38
真实 LLM 对话中的用户核查行为：归因语言与可查证据的差距
Signals, Evidence, and Context: User Scrutiny in Real-World LLM Conversations
AI 导读
研究分析 ShareChat 与 WildChat 的 489,283 组助手-用户回复对发现，31.9% 的相关回复含宽泛归因表述，但仅 1.33% 给出可查证 URL，说明"声称有依据"与"保留可核查证据"之间存在明显落差。
正文 · 原文
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) often present synthesized answers without making their supporting evidence easy to inspect. We study how features of these answers relate to users' subsequent accepting, checking, and challenging in 489,283 assistant-user response pairs from ShareChat and WildChat. Broad attribution language appears in 31.9% of qualifying responses, compared with explicit URLs in 1.33%, revealing a gap between claims of grounding and preserved inspectable support. Attribution, uncertainty, and other response cues generally accompany both checking and challenging; only uncertainty shows a small statistically distinguishable pooled association favoring checking. Within Technical Help, uncertainty favors checking relative to challenging; refusals and reasoning traces favor challenging in Seeking Information. Scrutiny is concentrated in some conversations, while its apparent turn-to-turn persistence becomes much smaller when conversation-level differences and response ordering are examined separately. These results suggest that supporting verification requires attention to what evidence can be inspected, which question a user is trying to resolve, and the history of the interaction.
| Subjects: | Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| ACM classes: | H.5.2; H.3.3; I.2.7 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2611.08232 [cs.AI] |
| (or arXiv:2611.08232v1 [cs.AI] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.08232 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) |
Submission history
From: Ahana Biswas [view email]
[v1]
Thu, 5 Nov 2026 16:16:08 UTC (316 KB)
来源：arXiv cs.AI · arxiv.org