Hacker News 评论被 LLM 变成冷邮件推销素材
I saw your HN comment
一位 Hacker News 用户发现,自己 2013 年以来收到的评论回信近两年从“信号”变成“噪音”,几乎全是推销。他让 Claude 通读全部历史邮件后确认:LLM 能针对他在 HN 上的真实评论写出极具说服力的个性化邮件,且常以开放式提问伪装关心,等他回复数段后再转向产品推销。他因此开始只回短邮件,收到推销才停止互动,但不愿撤下公开的邮箱地址。

I used to love getting emails from people in response to things I’ve written online, blog posts or Hacker News comments, but in the last 2 years it’s changed from mostly signal to mostly noise. I’ve met people in real life as a result of these emails, I’ve hired people based on these emails, and I’ve learned cool things through these emails but today it’s almost all pitches. I (had Claude) look through all the emails I’ve gotten about my posts and comments since 2013 to check my gut feeling:
LLMs have made this much easier, they can write convincing emails personalized to a real comment I wrote on HN. What’s worse is that they are often very deceptive. They don’t come out and say they are pitching you something, they ask a question, posing as if they care about the answer. Something like:
Hi Josh, saw your HN comment about [thing you said]. [Compliment.] I’m curious, [open-ended question]?
If someone took the time to email me asking a question I almost always respond to it but I’m having to rethink that policy. It’s like having an amplification attack pointed at you, someone sends 2-3 sentences (sometimes more) with an open-ended question then I turn around and write 2-3+ paragraphs to answer the question, only to get a response that is pitching a product/service. Here are a few real pivots I’ve received:
- “That’s close to what I’m building…”
- “The tool I mentioned, [product], works from the other end…”
- “Worth saying this is what we build at [company], so I’m not a neutral party.”
- “Would you have 15 min next week?”
It saddens me that what was once a rare joy and way to meet interesting people is now being abused to send cold emails. Look, I get it, cold emails are a fact of life, I’ve sent them before as well, but the deceptive ones are where I draw the line. I would never waste someone’s time without being upfront about why I’m contacting them. Personally I find this “growth hacking” to be disgusting and I will never use a product advertised to me in this way.
Because these people are obscuring the real reason, it’s impossible to tell what is a real question and what is just a setup to pitch. I resent having to read every one of these emails as a potential pitch, but I also try not to assume the worst about everyone that reaches out. I wouldn’t want to snub someone because I thought they were going to pitch to me when they had a legitimate question or just wanted to talk. I’ve started sending short emails back and only if I don’t get a pitch back do I actually engage but I dislike feeling distrustful, treating people as guilty until proven innocent. I love talking about tech, I love talking to other people about cool things they are doing, I hate being advertised to and I hate it even more when it’s wrapped up in fake interest.
I know there is nothing HN can do about this, it’s not their fault, I publicly post my email address on my profile, that’s on me. In the past it’s led to serendipity, now it more often leads to frustration.
My comments used to introduce me to interesting people, now they’re mostly LLM context for a sales pitch, grist for the mill. The internet I pine for might not be coming back, but I can’t bring myself to take my email address down. I’ll keep separating the wheat from the chaff. But I’ll be grumpy about it.
![]()
Engineering manager at Touchpoint, founder of GrubBux and FoodWeek, and I still spend most of my spare time building software.
来源:Hacker News · joshstrange.com
